D
Deleted member 63160
Will Mitch tell you that in his opinion, the Swedish woman has been raped 365 times more often than the British woman?
Or will he admit that his interpretation of the statistics is incorrect?
No I won't. I haven't interpreted anything. I haven't mentioned stats. I simply said that if a women is raped 365 times, she has been raped 365 times. That simple. Why do you try to start an argument?
I'm trying to explain to you why your interpretation is wrong. It is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what the statistics mean. This is called discussion, and not an argument.
I haven't interpreted anything. I'm not interested in stats. I'm not trying to prove that Sweden is a center of rape. I have no interest in race, religion, creed or culture in this instance. I'm not trying to make any point about anything other than if a women is raped 365 times, I think she has been raped 365 times. I believe that is the case regardless of her ethnicity or that of her attacker. That was my point nothing more. Why do you try to make out I meant more than that. Why try to start an argument??
Seriously, if a man punched you in the face 50 times would press charges as if you were struck once? If your neighbour burgled your house 365 times would you say he robbed you once? I've looked at your point re Sweden and you have have a very valid point. I accept that.
gasbanni claimed that Sweden is the rape capital of the world. I was explaining why that claim is false. Okay?
Absolutely. I agree. That's why I couldn't understand John D and yourself trying to create a disagreement with me. I was simply agreeing with the way Sweden count crimes. Nothing more, nothing less.