36 Tory MPs accused : Westminster sexual harassment scandal
- Thread starter SirGalahad
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2016
- Messages
- 5,880
- Reaction score
- 1,085
- Country
fallon's replacement was the chief whip.
The same whip who allegedly has a book containing a list of allegations about ministers, used to keep them in line. How is someone who had prior knowledge of various allegations better than those he replaces? Especially if appointed to a top role with zero cabinet experience ?
The same whip who allegedly has a book containing a list of allegations about ministers, used to keep them in line. How is someone who had prior knowledge of various allegations better than those he replaces? Especially if appointed to a top role with zero cabinet experience ?
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
Which point do you think I have missed.Youve missed the point.....too busy as usual trying to make your own
To me, it is obvious. You and **** end were suggesting that Fallon resigned over a knee touching incident, or a lewd suggestion to a colleague.
John, quite rightly challenged you on your assumption. To which you asked John to enlighten everyone with any knowledge that he had.
He did not need to. The news reports and Fallon's own statement were pretty self-evident:
Now which other point was there?
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,424
- Reaction score
- 540
- Country
I hope all MPs be they labour or Conservative that have harassed others will finally face the light of day.
Sponsored Links
some of these MP's and other government employees need to toughen up imho .
Blimey whinging about some remark about where to put yer cold hands poor little didums
these same Mp's / ministers may well have to talk / meet world leaders , who are masse murderers & Gangsters
Blimey whinging about some remark about where to put yer cold hands
poor little didums these same Mp's / ministers may well have to talk / meet world leaders , who are masse murderers & Gangsters
You missed the point because I didnt suggest Fallon resigned over a touched knee, the point I made was that Andrea Leadsom may have helped his resignation for political gain.
In post 103, I said there must be more reasons than a touched knee for him to resign:
It seems now that Gavin Williamson had a hand in the backstabbing as well.
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
You keep making these extremely vague comments without explaining what it is you are complaining about.
If I looked, I bet I could find loads of your vague comments relating to some or other 'point'.
What point have I supposedly missed?Youve missed the point.....too busy as usual trying to make your own
What criticism was leveled and what 'different point'was made?
If I looked, I bet I could find loads of your vague comments relating to some or other 'point'.
I see that a magazine is having to apologise for commenting that an actress appeared that she would be fun in bed. Probably.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41871444
Does this mean that all remarks regarding the attractiveness of women are now off limits and will it also apply to women commenting about men?
No more referring to hunks etc. and of course there will be no more groupies.
I may be a bit naive but could anyone tell me what we are supposed to think about, for example, Miley Cyrus cavorting naked or that singer on Graham Norton's show last night who wore a red plastic (one piece) swimsuit and red plastic thigh length boots and then went to sit on the couch like this and chat - with, of course, no one daring to mention that it might be inappropriate or, indeed, provocative.
Could Graham dress like this for the show?
Have I got the situation correct? - women can do what they want because men don't complain; men can't because women do.
For the group of two and two halves I am not talking about rape or abuse - just normal things which are no longer allowed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41871444
Does this mean that all remarks regarding the attractiveness of women are now off limits and will it also apply to women commenting about men?
No more referring to hunks etc. and of course there will be no more groupies.
I may be a bit naive but could anyone tell me what we are supposed to think about, for example, Miley Cyrus cavorting naked or that singer on Graham Norton's show last night who wore a red plastic (one piece) swimsuit and red plastic thigh length boots and then went to sit on the couch like this and chat - with, of course, no one daring to mention that it might be inappropriate or, indeed, provocative.
Could Graham dress like this for the show?
Have I got the situation correct? - women can do what they want because men don't complain; men can't because women do.
For the group of two and two halves I am not talking about rape or abuse - just normal things which are no longer allowed.
You keep making these extremely vague comments without explaining what it is you are complaining about.
What point have I supposedly missed?
What criticism was leveled and what 'different point'was made?
If I looked, I bet I could find loads of your vague comments relating to some or other 'point'.
Im sorry, is that too vague for you?
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
I did not miss the point. I merely made a different point than the one you eluded to several posts ago (post 91). Post 101, you and **** end assumed that Fallon had resigned over a touched knee. I made the point that John asked if you and **** end assumed you knew why Fallon had resigned. You asked John for further information. I responded that John did not need to supply the information because it was already public knowledge that there were other issues.
Remember:
Post 101.
If you know better please enlighten
Now if you think I missed the point because I commented on a different matter than the one you previously commented on, you are mistaken.
We do not need to think along the same lines as you, thank goodness. We can make our own comments without agreeing or disagreeing with any of your 'points'.
It was just you making another one of your silly 'missed the point' remark because it was your only retort.
that saying throwing the baby out with the bath water comes to mind over some of this nonsense
it will only get worse.
I remember some doc on the telley about prison officers that were being trained . some lady trainee complained because some one swore at her
snow flake generation , poor things , they will all need therapy , that will be the next thing all companies will have to supply therapists or counselling to its work force
(mind u working with way har bee u would need therapy, (assuming he works )
and counselling
it will only get worse.
I remember some doc on the telley about prison officers that were being trained . some lady trainee complained because some one swore at her
snow flake generation , poor things , they will all need therapy , that will be the next thing all companies will have to supply therapists or counselling to its work force
(mind u working with way har bee u would need therapy, (assuming he works )
and counselling
Last edited:
"Actress"? Filthy misogynistic pigs.
Its quite simple, you made this claim:
I did not.
How is that commenting on a different matter?
You seem to be confusing yourself
I did not.
How is that commenting on a different matter?
You seem to be confusing yourself
Sponsored Links
