nice day for a walk

[Brigadier]

It's not my fault if you two can't understand a compound sentence with a coordinating conjunction.
I suspect you can, but you have no sensible answer to my question. Therefore you plead ignorance.

I suppose that as you wrote the drivel, it was beyond expectation that you'd see it for the nonsense it is.

(Trying to rescue some meaning from your shoite-pile), a simpler reason would be that there just aren't enough Remain voters, like there weren't enough Remain voters.

 

[Doppleganger]

Why don't you start by asking a sensible question and then perhaps you may get a sensible answer. It's written poorly and the premise in the question is just as bad.

So you did understand me really.
You just have no sensible reply other than to follow brigadier's suggestion that you don't understand.
Even dp understood.

Ah so it's not how racist a person is but what headwear that person is wearing that determines how racist they are.

It absolutely can be an indication. It can demonstrate where their sympathies lie, and more whether they are racist or not, rather then the degree of racism.

If I wear a crash helmet one can safely assume that I am a motorbike rider.
If I wear a dog collar one can safely assume that I am a member of the clergy.
If someone wears a blue rosette at a political rally, one can safely assume that they are representing the Tories.
If someone wears a hat similar to that worn by the KKK one can safely assume that they sympathise with the ideology of the KKK.

So you've managed to call him a KKK member, then he has ideoligical beliefs rooted in the 1100s.

Either, or, you choose.
Sorry, you already did.

I suggested he was representative of the KKK, you corrected me and explained that he was representing the spirit of the crusades. I accepted your correction. He was representative of the fundamentally racist crusades. Or perhaps he was representing the spirit of both the KKK and the crusades?

The organisers still were happy to have him along.

 

[Doppleganger]

I suppose that as you wrote the drivel, it was beyond expectation that you'd see it for the nonsense it is.

(Trying to rescue some meaning from your shoite-pile), a simpler reason would be that there just aren't enough Remain voters, like there weren't enough Remain voters.

So you also did understand it really. You had no sensible response and you just wanted an excuse to be abusive.

 

[Ihavenojob]

If someone wears a hat similar to that worn by the KKK one can safely assume that they sympathise with the ideology of the KKK.

Pretty similar, different shade, but same effect.

 

[JohnD]

If I wear a dog collar one can safely assume that I am a member of the clergy.

Unless you are a Brexit supporter on a TV programme, where you may turn out to be an actor.

 

[Ihavenojob]

If I wear a crash helmet one can safely assume that I am a motorbike rider.

If I wear a dog collar one can safely assume that I am a member of the clergy.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

The remoaners are the desperate ones,trying to give vote to 16 year olds!!!

A colony once started a war of independence with the UK over the issue of taxation without representation.

Please make a moral case for the idea that people who are paying taxes should be denied any say in how they are spent.

 

[Brigadier]

So you also did understand it really. You had no sensible response and you just wanted an excuse to be abusive.

No, I asked for you to clarify your meaning. You were the one who started with the cocky attitude, Himmy.

 

[Brigadier]

So you also did understand it really. You had no sensible response and you just wanted an excuse to be abusive.

So, you agree that there aren't enough Remainers for, Remain.

 

[Notch7]

If someone wears a hat similar to that worn by the KKK one can safely assume that they sympathise with the ideology of the KKK.

KKK wear something based on a capirote.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capirote

Otherwise known as a pointy hood.

Did you spot the word pointy.

It means goes to a point, clues in the name.

Like dung

 

[Notch7]

A colony once started a war of independence with the UK over the issue of taxation without representation.

Please make a moral case for the idea that people who are paying taxes should be denied any say in how they are spent.

Young people dont work, they are too busy being brainwashed by their left wing teachers.

 

[SammyInnit]

So you did understand me really.

You still don't see your own contradiction, do you.

Are you suggesting that the real will of the people was thwarted because insufficient numbers of Remain supporters failed to vote?

I've no need to 'suggest' anything. If you're not as thick as you make yourself sound you know how a ballot works. Then again, last time I tried to explain that, you managed to twist it into a fictional work of art. Modern art, I'll add.

It absolutely can be an indication. It can demonstrate where their sympathies lie, and more whether they are racist or not, rather then the degree of racism.

An indicator is not definitive proof. You claimed he was a KKK member despite:
1) not managing to correctly identify the uniform of a KKK member
2) not having a shred of evidence to suggest so, yet you made that claim before proceeding to continue on your own rant about racism through history
3) conflated a KKK members ideology with that of someones during the 1100 crusades while still failing to correctly identify either

Either, or, you choose.
Sorry, you already did.

I did no such thing.

You claimed:

I see the they've been infiltrated by the KKK

This was before you tried to shift the burden of proof on to me for questioning your claim which you failed to back up with evidence. You've then continued to rant about who you would presume someone to be identified as based on a crash helmet or dog collar while failing to identify a KKK member in the first place.

On that very vague argument (and ironic considering how against defining features can identify a person and their traits I.e. Radism) I could say you're a terrorist sympathiser because you wear shoes.

When myself an notch suggested what we thought it looked like (very different from the claim you made), you then tried to conflate the two arguments based on race while all in all being unable to correctly identify either or back up your claim after the fact.

In other words, you're full of shi.t and you try really hard to deflect from the fact everyone can see it.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Young people dont work, they are too busy being brainwashed by their left wing teachers.

Oh look, you are wrong.

Imagine my surprise.

• https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentan...oyeetypes/datasets/regionalemploymentbyagex01
  
• https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentan...activitybyagegroupnotseasonallyadjusteda05nsa
• https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentan...icinactivitybyagegroupseasonallyadjusteda05sa

 

[Brigadier]

Insufficient numbers of Remain voted.
Sufficient numbers of Remain voted.



Both of the above make sense. The following, however, does not.

..........insufficient numbers of Remain supporters failed to vote?..........

 

[Notch7]

Oh look, you are wrong

Ha ha ha.

Your links dont say young people pay taxes.

Oh and the links dont mention brainwashing.

But apart from that, do pat yourself on the back old bean