I see you ask a question.
Let me just count how many of my questions you've answered on this thread, when I attempt to find out what you mean by your delphic utterances...
Oh.
I see.
You fekers will argue the opposite of everything damn thing..And what is the relevance of that remark?
Is the abuse of citizens justified when usage is not compulsory?
I see you ask a question.
Let me just count how many of my questions you've answered on this thread, when I attempt to find out what you mean by your delphic utterances...
Oh.
I see.
Words of wisdom...The dumb JohnD brigade will argue black is whiteNo one is forced to use social media.
I believe that, where someone willingly signs up to a platform and agrees to the rules of that platform, that is not "abuse".
I asked you a straight question.
I think they listen to you as well.I look forward to seeing some straight answers from you.
Better not hold my breath.
If they have operated in accordance with their published terms and conditions, is it "abuse"?
.......... your delphic utterances...
Willingly signs up? Agrees?
.................... without the consent of users in a potential breach of EU regulations................
We could make a start by ostracising the likes of FaceAche, Starbucks.
Particularly the government. No expenses claims. Stop all this "follow us on fb" crap on everything from roadworks to whatever else.
If they have operated in accordance with their published terms and conditions, is it "abuse"?
No one is forced to use social media.
Perhaps the EU would have different rules if facebook was French not American.