you linked that article as though it was proof of racism.They both agree
where is that proof.
Also the article was published before the human genome project was completed -so they cant agree
you linked that article as though it was proof of racism.They both agree
How, then can you accept that there are women?
I do not need to explain myself over and over again because you demand it. Why? Because it's a waste of time as you don't have the ability of logic. You've made something up out of thin air then convinced yourself it's true - there is no evidence and nor will you be willing to change your view. Being 'right' for you is everything and you'd never ever change your mind, even when it's as plain as day to everyone else that you're wrong.
I also think you're in absolutely no position to complain about insults when it's you who is calling people racist without any proof. You're an hateful individual who thinks he's better than anyone else when the reality is the opposite. An individual who jumps to conclusions without a shred of evidence or intelligence and does his best to create divide here on a DIY forum.
You're also a liar.
incorrect, you have not provided any evidence that is true.
it is your opinion.
So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.He cannot tell the difference. He has no ability to think logically...
oh dear oh dearSo the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.
What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?
You've been offered the chance again and again to prove that we are racist. And you don't. I wonder why?So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.
What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?
You do seem very obsessive about hating people and racism..I do think,like BAS you are self obsessed with being argumentative and pedantic rather than having a general dislike of racism and lovin everyone on the planet.I do think you are a troubled soul who would benefit more from mixing with people and less time googling and typing.Brexiteers are a different race to you!!!!So the three main proponents of racial essentialism have been offered the chance to prove categorically that they are not racist, by stating that they do not ascribe to the inherently racist philosophy of racial essentialism.
Do they take that opportunity? No! They avoid the simple question.
It doesn't take much logic to understand why.
What do they do instead, one of them resorts to silliness, another resorts to abuse and insult, and the other persists with his denial of the obvious, trying to circle his way round the scientific definitions.
What more proof is required that these three are fundamentally racist?
100%.You do seem very obsessive about hating people and racism..I do think,like BAS you are self obsessed with being argumentative and pedantic rather than having a general dislike of racism and lovin everyone on the planet.
Precisely...Hint. Your opinion is NOT proof.
I see you are still clinging to the idea that you should be so ($&*"W*%&~ thick as to promote the idea that if you claim something is true it is up to everybody else to prove it isn't, ignoring the fact that for you to claim it in the first place you MUST have evidence.I dont have to, you are the one that made the claim there is only 1 race -which you have yet to prove
Lol....new week,,same old rot from BAS...like religion you mean...Absolutely no scientific evidence to prove God exists,yet half the planet believe,and accept it.. And you have this weird perception that whatever you say,is fact!.I see you are still clinging to the idea that you should be so ($&*"W*%&~ thick as to promote the idea that if you claim something is true it is up to everybody else to prove it isn't, ignoring the fact that for you to claim it in the first place you MUST have evidence.
Anyway - here is the proof.I dont have to, you are the one that made the claim there is only 1 race -which you have yet to prove
People believe and accept all sorts of incorrect things - that's the point.Lol....new week,,same old rot from BAS...like religion you mean...Atbsolutely no scientific evidence to prove God exists,yet half the planet believe,and accept it.
Does it matter?...The root of your nonsense is that brexiteers are all racist,,,no remoaners are,,,which is nonsense
Yes I agree - I dont know why Jasonzyx or you cant get it.I see you are still clinging to the idea that you should be so ($&*"W*%&~ thick as to promote the idea that if you claim something is true it is up to everybody else to prove it isn't, ignoring the fact that for you to claim it in the first place you MUST have evidence.
Science recognises gender differences in Homo sapiens.
How, then can you accept that there are women?