Good point. Whilst Bozza was still dithering over that one Angela was testing, testing, testing.
Give Boris Some Credit
- Thread starter securespark
- Start date
- Status
B
Bodd
I know no facts so I'm not making anything up. You however know no facts..... Are you making things up???
I meant for the U.K.
Ok. Who would have done a better job as PM from any party?
- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 45,856
- Reaction score
- 3,514
- Country
We don't know that, because BJ is PM.
Bozza is in charge and he's crap. Deal with it mottie. We lost you won. Own it. Jacinda is better, Merkel is brill, Bozza is crap.
Angela has the advantage of being a serious grown-up who pays attention to her job.
And also not being saddled with a health and social system that has been run down an underfunded by the government and party of which she has been a part.
Unlike our buffoon.
Do you think he will keep repeating his mantra 'get Brexit done' throughout his tenure? After all, it arouses the RWR/BHS and keeps them under heel.
Poor sods.
Perhaps he'll say "get coronavirus done."
He's already achieved his target of 20,000 deaths.
We can see a serious grown-up dealing with a waffling buffoon if we want to.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-po...mer-and-johnson-on-uk-coronavirus-death-rates
Johnson would feel more at home with a bunch of braying ninnies behind him, and spouting meaningless slogans.
He's already achieved his target of 20,000 deaths.
We can see a serious grown-up dealing with a waffling buffoon if we want to.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-po...mer-and-johnson-on-uk-coronavirus-death-rates
Johnson would feel more at home with a bunch of braying ninnies behind him, and spouting meaningless slogans.
Here we see a page from an official SAGE report into the government's handling of the crisis.
Parts showing the government in a bad light were censored before publication.
A page from an official Sage report critical of government proposals over the coronavirus lockdown that was heavily redacted.
"Government scientific advisers are furious at what they see as an attempt to censor their advice on government proposals during the Covid-19 lockdown by heavily redacting an official report before it was released to the public, the Guardian can reveal.
The report was one of a series of documents published by the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (Sage) this week to mollify growing criticism about the lack of transparency over the advice given to ministers responding to the coronavirus.
However, large blocks of text in the report, produced by SPI-B, the Sage subcommittee providing advice from behavioural scientists on how the public might respond to lockdown measures, were entirely blanked out."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-fury-over-attempt-to-censor-covid-19-advice
"Several SPI–B members told the Guardian that the redacted portions of the document contained criticisms they had made of potential government policies they had been formally asked to consider in late March and early April.
One SPI-B adviser said: “It is bloody silly, and completely counterproductive.” A second committee member said: “The impression I’m getting is this government doesn’t want any criticism.”
Parts showing the government in a bad light were censored before publication.
A page from an official Sage report critical of government proposals over the coronavirus lockdown that was heavily redacted.
"Government scientific advisers are furious at what they see as an attempt to censor their advice on government proposals during the Covid-19 lockdown by heavily redacting an official report before it was released to the public, the Guardian can reveal.
The report was one of a series of documents published by the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (Sage) this week to mollify growing criticism about the lack of transparency over the advice given to ministers responding to the coronavirus.
However, large blocks of text in the report, produced by SPI-B, the Sage subcommittee providing advice from behavioural scientists on how the public might respond to lockdown measures, were entirely blanked out."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-fury-over-attempt-to-censor-covid-19-advice
"Several SPI–B members told the Guardian that the redacted portions of the document contained criticisms they had made of potential government policies they had been formally asked to consider in late March and early April.
One SPI-B adviser said: “It is bloody silly, and completely counterproductive.” A second committee member said: “The impression I’m getting is this government doesn’t want any criticism.”
S
sodthisforfun
If you can be bothered to read the link I sent then you'd see am not making things up.
The virus can be spread regardless of the climate. Now please give me some facts that back up your claim that Nz/Oz didn't suffer so much because of their climate.
S
sodthisforfun
Did he not tell us "‘Many more families are going to lose loved ones before their time," rather than start the lockdown/take proper precautions?
How nice.
Be prepared for bodd to post 'nzoz' lol and claim it was all a joke.
- Status
Similar threads
