Read the thread title. It’s about those people.
human rights lawyers have blocked 1st plane of asylum seekers to Rwanda
- Thread starter Notch7
- Start date
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2016
- Messages
- 6,194
- Reaction score
- 1,167
- Country
What I find disturbing about the main posters in this thread is their distaste for lawyers who are simply asking for clarification of whether something is indeed lawful. This also covers the Brexit case/"enemies of the people"
If you were in court, you'd expect your lawyer to query the legality of the alleged incident and be grateful if you won.
Surely "all that is exceptional about the UK" is the separation of the Executive and The Judiciary. The Government MUST ensure that what it does is within the law.
Would you prefer a Government that ignores Rule of Law?
Apparently Patel hasn't met the Inspector of Borders once in 14 months
If you were in court, you'd expect your lawyer to query the legality of the alleged incident and be grateful if you won.
Surely "all that is exceptional about the UK" is the separation of the Executive and The Judiciary. The Government MUST ensure that what it does is within the law.
Would you prefer a Government that ignores Rule of Law?
Apparently Patel hasn't met the Inspector of Borders once in 14 months
Hoping I get the term right 
I posted what they mean. There seems to be valid reasons for refusing entry to asylum seekers. Crime for instance even if they come from a war area etc. The are lots of the IS in refugee camps - stuck there.
Sending them to a specific country is the odd part but what to do with them when they arrive illegally. They could apply legally when passing through other countries. They may not be able to where they come from.
Then comes the international laws concerning what constitutes a refugee and what can be done with them.
Then take Afghanistan. It would appear that countries decided to take a certain number of people. it would appear that all women who live there could be valid refugees.
The laws though. International and across countries ones are usually agreed. I haven't a clue what they are or who has signed up to them.
Looks like the poor old judge has a lot to look into such as specific reason for each person being deported. Then where they are being sent. Can refugees apply elsewhere. Even are the laws laws probably.
I posted what they mean. There seems to be valid reasons for refusing entry to asylum seekers. Crime for instance even if they come from a war area etc. The are lots of the IS in refugee camps - stuck there.Sending them to a specific country is the odd part but what to do with them when they arrive illegally. They could apply legally when passing through other countries. They may not be able to where they come from.
Then comes the international laws concerning what constitutes a refugee and what can be done with them.
Then take Afghanistan. It would appear that countries decided to take a certain number of people. it would appear that all women who live there could be valid refugees.
The laws though. International and across countries ones are usually agreed. I haven't a clue what they are or who has signed up to them.
Looks like the poor old judge has a lot to look into such as specific reason for each person being deported. Then where they are being sent. Can refugees apply elsewhere. Even are the laws laws probably.
That is shameful.
Does he HAVE to meet with her? Do independent people have to meet with the head of the organisation they work with/for? Has the owner of the independent cleaning company of my local hospital met with the health minister? Has the school janitor of my local comprehensive met with the minister for education?
The Home Office said: "As the Independent Chief Inspector for Borders and Immigration made clear, he has met with Home Office ministers on a regular basis and been well served by them."
The Home Office said: "As the Independent Chief Inspector for Borders and Immigration made clear, he has met with Home Office ministers on a regular basis and been well served by them."
It would indicate some serious disfunction in either the civil service or Priti Patel.
Unfortunately, the civil service seem to view the current government as their enemy and not their boss.
D
Deleted member 18243
Your Ministry of Truth figures have forgotten all those who come here on visas. But don't worry, they'll go home eventually. *Cough*
Analysis of Home Office immigration and visa statistics release for year to March 2022 - Migration Watch UK
Work visas: 277,000 (50% higher than pre-pandemic) Sponsored-study visas: 466,000 (58% more than pre-pandemic) Family visas and permits: 301,830 (63% more than pre-pandemic) Asylum claims: 55,146 (56% more than pre-pandemic). The new visa statistics suggest that about a million people were...
www.migrationwatchuk.org
And don't forget the illegals on the boats, expected to number 100,000 this year.
Unsurprisingly there’s been no answer to this from @Notch7. He never could answer those really difficult questions.
I mean, if there really were compelling reasons for them to end up in the UK after travelling through Italy and France, you’d think they'd at least get their wives and kids to one of those safe countries, wouldn’t you?
The court has not ruled on the caper yet
Governments have a duty of care to safe guard people’s safety
Deterring boats across the channel is looking after there safety
Governments are not in power to appease and encourage people traffickers ( criminals)
How ever all those in favour of the migrants coming across the channel can be asked to put there money were there mouths are
And volunteer to pay a migrant tax
Nah I did not think they would
there All p*** and wind
Governments have a duty of care to safe guard people’s safety
Deterring boats across the channel is looking after there safety
Governments are not in power to appease and encourage people traffickers ( criminals)
How ever all those in favour of the migrants coming across the channel can be asked to put there money were there mouths are
And volunteer to pay a migrant tax
Nah I did not think they would
there All p*** and wind
According to the UN who told her twice it was not Priti has lied to the house - must be catching.
The have been over ruled, and the flight goes ahead next week..
I suppose after multiple requests he could always beg?
