Maybe they have Russian gas, specially doctored so as to make it less efficientI just boiled water for my cup of tea in 90 seconds on the hob. Maybe their gas isn't as good as ours either.
I think a lot of people do that. I wonder how much time difference there actually is (for the same amount of water), hence whether the magnitude of the difference may sometimes be a 'misconception'?I must admit, when I make poached eggs for my lunch at the weekend I usually boil the water in the kettle first, mainly because it's faster than my gas cooker.
You seem to be assuming that you will be able to afford to buy eggs (or do you have some chickens in the garden?)Although this may be a thing of the past as I shall soon be having them raw, shell n all while sitting here in the dark looking at a blank screen
One problem with that is that a good few of the most energy-consuming loads are not 'plugged in'.
I must admit, when I make poached eggs for my lunch at the weekend I usually boil the water in the kettle first, mainly because it's faster than my gas cooker.
Although this may be a thing of the past as I shall soon be having them raw, shell n all while sitting here in the dark looking at a blank screen
You seem to be assuming that you will be able to afford to buy eggs (or do you have some chickens in the garden?)
One should, but I think it's the fact that so many people do not seem to have that 'basic idea' that is one of the main problems.All of which tend to be marked with their consumption and don't run irregularly, so you should have some basic idea of what they cost to run.
I have an immersion heater, cooker, central heating boiler, pump etc, shower, and some lights not plugged in. The shower I can read the rating, and some of the lights, those with smart bulbs not a clue what they use without putting bulb in a table or standard lamp to measure, and heater, cooker, central heating boiler, pump etc, run on a mark/space control of some type, so may be 3 kW element but not a clue what it would use if left switched on.All of which tend to be marked with their consumption and don't run irregularly, so you should have some basic idea of what they cost to run.
As I posted earlier (#56)Somewhat relevant:
I'm finding exactly the opposite here, replacing an incandescent bulb was not a common feature but I'm now finding I keep a large stock of 'new type' 'bulbs' and seem to go to that shelf on a regular basis, oh and let's not forget modern 'bulbs' cost a lot more than incandescents.Sure, that too - but I would hope that most people are aware of that by now (and, to a large extent, are being 'forced' to move to LEDs). It wasn't only the running costs, either. In the days of incandescents, with my very large house, I found myself having to buy large batches of bulbs every month or three - but now I buy small batches of LEDs every year or 3!
Kind Regards, John
I'm finding exactly the opposite here, replacing an incandescent bulb was not a common feature but I'm now finding I keep a large stock of 'new type' 'bulbs' and seem to go to that shelf on a regular basis, oh and let's not forget modern 'bulbs' cost a lot more than incandescents.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local