Sue Gray

[motorbiking]

More lies - I've posted several links to papers reporting on Naghty Sue. You literally just have to google her name and click news. Since your star witness is going with "No comment" and her new would be boss saying its for her to share the info [which she hasn't]. it's your claim that she is innocent of wrong doing that is in tatters.

If you got a speeding ticket and when asked by magistrates was it you driving JohnD, and you went with "no comment". do you think you would:

A get off
B get points for speeding

If you need a hint the aswer isn't A.

If nothing dodgy has happened, why wouldn't Sir Keir answer the question on the first or 8th time? Does the man not have a diary?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

More lies - I've posted several links to papers reporting on Naghty Sue. You literally just have to google her name and click news. Since your star witness is going with "No comment" and her new would be boss saying its for her to share the info [which she hasn't]. it's your claim that she is innocent of wrong doing that is in tatters.

If you got a speeding ticket and when asked by magistrates was it you driving JohnD, and you went with "no comment". do you think you would:

A get off
B get points for speeding

If you need a hint the aswer isn't A.

If nothing dodgy has happened, why wouldn't Sir Keir answer the question on the first or 8th time? Does the man not have a diary?

has he or she refused to answer any official request for such information ? Is it just mud that is being thrown by some ?

this press release, do you have a link for it? Lots of mud out there, can't find this incriminating piece

 

[IT Minion]

The sun isn't a magistrate, the daily mail has no right to know anything. The telegraph has no commitment to neutrality.

There's an actual review going through the process. Why engage with a voluntary one being run by the person who apparently blocked your promotion and drove you out your job?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

The sun isn't a magistrate, the daily mail has no right to know anything. The telegraph has no commitment to neutrality.

There's an actual review going through the process. Why engage with a voluntary one being run by the person who apparently blocked your promotion and drove you out your job?

A lot of mud being thrown

 

[Brigadier]

If you got a speeding ticket and when asked by magistrates was it you driving JohnD, and you went with "no comment". do you think you would:

A get off
B get points for speeding

Your example is not comparable to the situation under discussion though, is it?

 

[motorbiking]

The sun isn't a magistrate, the daily mail has no right to know anything. The telegraph has no commitment to neutrality.

There's an actual review going through the process. Why engage with a voluntary one being run by the person who apparently blocked your promotion and drove you out your job?

Keir Starmer chose to do the interview, why would he not answer the question?

It's a simple question - when did they start discussing the role with Sue. Nobody who knows is willing to answer.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Keir Starmer chose to do the interview, why would he not answer the question?

It's a simple question - when did they start discussing the role with Sue. Nobody who knows is willing to answer.

is that the best you have ?

 

[motorbiking]

Why do you think he refused to answer the question?

its fair for people to conclude, they are hiding something. Why would you hide something, when you could put the record straight?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Why do you think he refused to answer the question?

I have no interest in that and I don't know.

I want to see an official report decision, oh and that press release. You do have a link ?

 

[Brigadier]

Keir Starmer chose to do the interview, why would he not answer the question?

What are you trying to prove?

 

[IT Minion]

Keir Starmer chose to do the interview, why would he not answer the question?

It's a simple question - when did they start discussing the role with Sue. Nobody who knows is willing to answer.

Not to the press, but I suspect the toothless ACOBA that is investigating did get an answer.

Do we know when they'll give their opinion?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

What are you trying to prove?

That mud sticks

 

[motorbiking]

Its reasonable, in the absence of any conflicting evidence, to conclude that conversations about the CoS job were happening well before the announcement and that Sue Gray, was still very much involved in her role serving the current Tory government, while discussing her possible role with the opposition. To reveal the truth, would expose the conflict of interest and damage both her and Keir Starmer's aim to be squeaky clean.

Rational people will not believe it was all done and dusted in a day or 2, when the previous CoS was sacked back in October. We have a very experienced lawyer and ex-civil servant. "No Comment" seems to be their strategy. It sucks credibility.

 

[Odds]

That mud sticks

Speaking of mud...he whose name is now Mud has an expected answer to the Partygate inquiry this month....al this chaff thrown around Sue Gray wouldn't be an attempt to deflect from this now, would it?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Its reasonable, in the absence of any conflicting evidence, to conclude that conversations about the CoS job were happening well before the announcement and that Sue Gray, was still very much involved in her role serving the current Tory government, while discussing her possible role with the opposition. To reveal the truth, would expose the conflict of interest and damage both her and Keir Starmer's aim to be squeaky clean.

Rational people will not believe it was all done and dusted in a day or 2, when the previous CoS was sacked back in October. We have a very experienced lawyer and ex-civil servant. "No Comment" seems to be their strategy. It sucks credibility

No evidence then ?