Is it time for a wealth tax?

As a growing numbers of countries consider raising taxes on the ultra-wealthy, the Tax Justice Network campaign group said in a report that evidence from a “featherlight” tax on the 0.5% richest households in Spain could help raise trillions of dollars globally each year. The Spanish government, under the socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, introduced a temporary “solidarity” wealth tax in late 2022, which is collected in 2023 and 2024, on the net wealth of individuals exceeding €3m (£2.6m). It is estimated to apply to the richest 0.5% of households.

The Tax Justice Network said applying a similar tax on the top 0.5% wealthiest households worldwide, at a rate of between 1.7% and 3.5%, would raise about $2.1tn. The study excluded some exemptions in the Spanish tax – including for shares in listed companies, intellectual property and industrial property, and some high-value assets such as boats and aircraft.

It said as much as $31bn a year would be raised from the UK.

The study comes as the G20 explores plans for a global minimum tax on the world’s 3,000 billionaires under the Brazilian presidency of leftwing leader Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. France, Germany, Spain and South Africa have also indicated support for the proposals.

The Garundian
 
The study excluded some exemptions in the Spanish tax – including for shares in listed companies, intellectual property and industrial property, and some high-value assets such as boats and aircraft.
Interesting aspect - what would happen if they had to sell them to pay it? Cash and assets are 2 totally different subjects. Most super rich have very very high levels of assets included in their wealth measure.

Spooky. Just turned on BBC Business news Pundits are saying Spain has the correct solution but obviously it wont raise as much money. The fact that it may cause them to do more useful things with cash wasn't mentioned. Then comes the aspect of where in the world do they use it.
 
For the most wealthy (in UK) most wealth is held in the form of property and pension schemes, followed by investments. The middling wealthy have a wedge in businesses.

Cash and savings is not a large proportion, unless you are quite poor. You hold what you think you need.

Because as we all know, its value dwindles by inflation.
 
Interesting to note that the Brexit disaster, and Conservative dishonesty and instability, have made UK unattractive to itinerant billionaires.

"The UK was expected to lose a net 3,200 high-net-worth individuals last year, the most in Europe and double 2022’s level, citizenship advisory firm Henley & Partners estimated. Britain’s reputation for legal and political stability has been rocked by the upheaval of Brexit and the chop-and-change of five different Tory Prime Ministers since 2016."

That's Conservatives for you.
 
We wont know how many move until it happens and we will also have some of our own.

Long ago prior to removal of exchange controls a Scandinavian came up with an interesting view of wealth in the UK. He scaled it to people's height. It started incredibly low and a typical company director reached average height. At one point there was a step that put people's heads in the clouds. This happened pretty rapidly.

Maybe thing have levelled out more or maybe not. People in general now own more but that in effect also kicks in more wealth at the top end.
 
I saw an article a few weeks ago, about offshoring money / wealth.

The guy was arguing that the ownership of UK-based assets, by foreign individuals and companies who then strip the profits from them, should be dissuaded through taxation.


An interesting way of looking at it was:

In times gone by, we had an army to prevent foreign invaders from taking our wealth.
Nowadays we should do the same, but via taxation.
 
Water company and other similar profits are regulated. Profits relatively low as risk is low. Sure some don't perform well or behave oddly but that general rule still applies. They may attract pension funds and reserve type investments. To do that they need to offer some particular level of profit.

Something else mentioned in business news. Sort of thing that does go on as well;
A lot of money to do this - borrowed or from investors - I don't know. It's a lot more than any company is likely to have kicking around. Cadbury's spring to mind. There has been others.
 
Last edited:
Wealth tax/ redistribution. Don't worry, Labour will be on it.
I guess you prefer the fact this country has flogged everything, so now our public services and utilities are foreign owned to sovereign wealth funds.

But if you think free markets mean free, enjoy
 
Apart from SSE, Centrica, Octopus, National Grid...

some of which own sizeable chunks of the US market.
 
Apart from SSE, Centrica, Octopus, National Grid...

some of which own sizeable chunks of the US market.

SSE is not an English company, of course.

Nor is SWALEC

Nor, for different reasons, is Scotia Gas.
 
Back
Top