Boat illegals up under Labour.

[Deleted member 317777]

You best put them toys back in the pram

No toys out you silly sausage.

I’m just stating facts.

I don’t like noseal, he’s a nasty vindictive keyboard warrior.

He’s not man enough to reply to me, but takes cheap shots. That really tickles me. I live rent feee in his head.

 

[denso13]

But if you had to put one before the other, who would you give priority to?

Probably curing children of illness would come first. Do you want to do a big list?

 

[motorbiking]

It's simple - if we tax the wealthy too highly, then they take their money and investment elsewhere, and everyone looses.

Correct. As evidenced by thousands who have left.

 

[motorbiking]

You haven’t read it.

Art. 98 (1) says you are wrong

Nothing stops them from being “assisted” when they depart or once they are refused passage. Easy to take them to the nearest point of safety at that point.

I wonder which is closer for a vessel not in U.K. territorial waters…. Is it france? I think it is.

Nice try though.

So.. we are clear a coastal state has the right to prevent vessels up to no good, from entering its territorial waters. As per article 25 of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea.

 

[transam]

and 300 don't decide to not only risk their lives, as well pay handsomely for the privilege of crossing, unless there is a promised pot of gold at the other side. The word spreads back, from those who earlier crossed, living in relative luxury. Remove the enticement, and the problem ends..

Enticement

Blimey let’s hope ? They don’t get wind of the 1.5 million new homes going to be built

 

[Mottie]

Probably curing children of illness would come first. Do you want to do a big list?

Nice swerve but sick children in this country are rarely homeless. We are talking about housing and feeding either boat migrants or our own homeless or poor pensioners from a limited pot of money. It’s quite obvious from your swerve who you would prioritise but you just don't have the balls to say it. Perhaps you’re embarrassed?

 

[denso13]

We are talking about housing and feeding either boat migrants or our own homeless or poor pensioners from a limited pot of money.

No, you are. I'm not playing your silly games with peoples lives.

 

[fillyboy]

Yes, but the homelessness problem has been going on a lot longer than asylum seeker arrivals. I don't think it's an either or choice.

Oh, have we still got asylum seeker arrivals?, I thought two tier Keir was going to stop the boats, has something gone wrong?

 

[Deleted member 317777]

No, you are. I'm not playing your silly games with peoples lives.

What are you talking about then ?

 

[denso13]

I thought two tier Keir was going to stop the boats, has something gone wrong?

Not after six months. I'll judge him down the line a bit.

 

[denso13]

What are you talking about then ?

I'm talking about treating migrants humanly. Mottie then asks which one I'd feed first, a migrant or a homeless person. Totally idiotic.

 

[fillyboy]

Not after six months. I'll judge him down the line a bit.

No, he was going to break the migrant gangs and stop boat arrivals from day 1, he was actually quite clear about that.

Did you perhaps mis-hear him?

 

[Deleted member 317777]

I'm talking about treating migrants humanly. Mottie then asks which one I'd feed first, a migrant or a homeless person. Totally idiotic.

Yes and no.

The homeless haven’t risked their life’s to arrive in the uk, via many countries to need feeding.

The UK homeless are homeless in their own country.

It’s a horrible situation for everyone.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

No, he was going to break the migrant gangs and stop boat arrivals from day 1, he was actually quite clear about that.

Did you perhaps mis-hear him?

He’s waiting…..

 

[fillyboy]

I'm talking about treating migrants humanly. Mottie then asks which one I'd feed first, a migrant or a homeless person. Totally idiotic.

Idiotic to look after your own first? really?, I doubt many would agree with you.