Are you preparing for the incoming collapse of the UK ?

[MNW67]

feed them egg and chips

I love egg and chips! Sometimes on its own, sometimes with beans.

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Erm, ... ''legally'' .. you mean having to face a bunch of unelected judges from blocking a deportation mandate given to the government by the people ?

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

What do you mean?

What you say about it, it’s basically meaningless

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Me too! I still haven't bought an air fryer.

Do it. You'll wonder how you've ver did without

 

[HawkEye244]

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

We already live in a totalitarian state in case you hadn't noticed. People are currently sat in prison for posting opinions on the internet - over 12,000 arrests were made in the UK in 2023 via the government using the Communications Act. This is significantly more than Russia. AND these statistics are from 2023, before most of the stupid people in this country woke up to what has been happening for the past 30 years.

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Really? Seems to me, from what you wrote, that you'd like a state like Russia. You want to deport people without due process, despite us having laws which give them at least some rights. I don't like quite a few of the immigrants I've had to work with (do you ever associate with immigrants, or is your view of things second hand?) but they aren't all chiselling gits. Some of them are actually decent human beings. A few are actually friends. Maybe instead of talking down people who aren't white, middle class English you should talk to some of them?

 

[johnny2007]

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

Himmy, you're back so soon???

 

[GhostIntMachine]

How'd you guess?

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Remind me... Just who is Himmy?

 

[johnny2007]

.

 

[johnny2007]

How'd you guess?

I'm 100% sure that I am not the only one who "guessed" it.
You're a nutter!

 

[Lirefighter]

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

This is not meant as a belittling reply at all, but if you honestly believe what you have posted there, then you are extremely nieve.
Political influence feels it way out to all aspects of society's governance no matter the type.
In a democracy, more time and effort is given to covering up the fact that it happens.
In a dictatorship, more time and effort is given to promoting how beneficial it is.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

I'd honestly like to avoid looking into the amount of British women

I bet you would. Looking into some of your past history, you;d probably like to get close enough to some women to talk to them.

As for your extreme right wing views, here's a typical example of your glorification of another convicted felon, Tommy Robinson:

He is not a criminal. He was wrongly imprisoned and tortured by left wing Marxist partisans. He's a British patriot who wants to make Brits aware that their freedoms are being taken away. He's a modern day hero. He's a target of Soros funded MSM.

Let he who is innocent cast the first stone.

All those offences he served time for. Time served and now a free man, not a criminal.

The 'recent' stuff carries no clout at all. He was falsely imprisoned and tortured by the state and is owed not just an apology but reperations.

And here's an example of your standard of personal hygeine:

Motorbike helmet irritating skin​

Massage p1ss or semen into it - just make sure it's your own. Even if it doesn't work it's a talking point at future social events.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

There was fifteen thousand stabbings in London alone last year, and that doesn't account for 2025 at all. I suggest you dislodge your head from your sand box; not only is it going to happen, many would argue it already is happening.

Your opinions are so obviously tainted by your racist ideology.
Here's your racist ideology presented by yourself:

I'd like to blame the police but I blame the parents, and before anyone says you can't blame the parents, you can, I just have. What the fuk are you thinking letting your young child hang around with disgusting migrant filth ? Secondly, blame this society for giving criminals a freedom pass to go around breaking the law, but it's the parents responsibility to look after their child, not the state. Ultimately this culture is now so warped you can't even discipline your own child and disciple, boundaries and stern parenting would have stopped these children from being in these vulnerable positions.

Will always have strong affection for a country that treats terrorist migrants properly.. beats the **** out of them with battons and frog marches them around

 

[fillyboy]

Himmy, you're back so soon???

It's almost like he never left.