How does that work? A blockade?
Would you need a blockade? I think MBK said previously that there is plenty of time to intercept each boat as required because they go very slowly and are easy to track.
How does that work? A blockade?
You'd best brush up on UCLOSnonsense
Why are you repeating what I've just said? Do you not read my comments before responding?except when they have been rescued
Similarly, Notch and Noseall has repeatedly said that UK boats cannot land refugees in France with their agreement. That is true, unless they have been rescued.
That'll be up to the rescue boat not you, nor the UK government. And if they do choose to land them in France it will be for medical emergency.back to France they go.
If you don't claim you become an illegal immigrant.If you don't claim you have no protection
nobody is trying to sink them.
Even a jetski would be able to nudge a migrant boat around.
We've gone from shooting the boat full of holes, to pushing them with a boat hook, to nudging them with more powerful craft, to splashing them or blowing at them.No more than a wave, some wind, some prop wash.
Push back, however it is achieved is illegal.They are refused entry and turned around. Simple.
Intercept to rescue = OK,Would you need a blockade? I think MBK said previously that there is plenty of time to intercept each boat as required because they go very slowly and are easy to track.
Intercept to rescue = OK,
Intercept to push back = illegal and endangers lives.

You have gone from this, nobody else has.We've gone from shooting the boat full of holes, to pushing them with a boat hook, to nudging them with more powerful craft, to splashing them or blowing at them.
What a climb down.
It started with the Reform councillor suggesting shooting the boats to sink them, except he didn't mention "to sink them".You have gone from this, nobody else has.

Why would you want to sink them? Surely MBK has a much better sollution to the problem. I would say shooting the boat is too extreme unless it is carried out to stop it rather than to sink it.It started with the Reform councillor suggesting shooting the boats to sink them, except he didn't mention "to sink them".
It has now arrived at mbk suggesting a bit of wind and water to persuade the refugees to turn around.![]()
Sorry, I have no intention of repeating the last 30 pages because you can't be bothered to catch up.Why would you want to sink them? Surely MBK has a much better sollution to the problem. I would say shooting the boat is too extreme unless it is carried out to stop it rather than to sink it.

yes you seem the type to keep pigeonsSorry, I have no intention of repeating the last 30 pages because you can't be bothered to catch up.
I've got to feed the pigeons.![]()
He did?Would you need a blockade? I think MBK said previously that there is plenty of time to intercept each boat as required because they go very slowly and are easy to track.
He did?
And you believe it's that easy?

It is.I don't know enough. It sounded plausible.

Nope.You'd best brush up on UCLOS
Why are you repeating what I've just said? Do you not read my comments before responding?
That'll be up to the rescue boat not you, nor the UK government. And if they do choose to land them in France it will be for medical emergency.
If you don't claim you become an illegal immigrant.
We've gone from shooting the boat full of holes, to pushing them with a boat hook, to nudging them with more powerful craft, to splashing them or blowing at them.
What a climb down.
Push back, however it is achieved is illegal.![]()

It’s almost like they practiced it using jetskis. Oh wait they did.I don't know enough. It sounded plausible.

Except they have lawful excuse. You forgot that bit.Intercept to rescue = OK,
Intercept to push back = illegal and endangers lives.