Ssssssshhhhhh, don't mention Reform.

In French waters - Its up to the French to enforce their laws. Dozens are broken.
Boats travelling away from the French Coast can hardly be described as risking the security of France. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:


It is no more risky to steer a boat from the bow than the stern. In fact the stability would be increased.
You're interfering with the passage of innocent vessels, undoubtedly against their will. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
And you suggest the stability will be improved? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

You seem to have.
You have demonstrated that you do.
There's no 'seem' about it.

If you put the rest of your nonsense in to a single post, I might reply.
I fyou keep posting your absurd nonsense I'll keep proving you wrong. :ROFLMAO:
 
If you arrive at a foreign port with passengers disembarking, not having the correct documentation, you risk the boat being impounded and you arrested.
You ought to learn the rules if you intend to go sailing.
Mbk will misdirect you if the rules go against his political ideology.

Even if requested by a Rescue Co-ordination Centre (RCC) or other shore officials, the Master has no authority, obligation or responsibility for listening to, acting upon or communicating information concerning the legal status of rescued persons or applications for asylum. The Master has no responsibility for determining the status of those rescued.

The sole responsibility of the Master and the crew is to maintain the safety and, as far as practicable, ensure the humane treatment of rescued people, and co-operate in their disembarkation at a place of safety.

 
Yes that went well. Must surely be all behind bars by now and yet they are still arriving.,
Because the market model exists.
If you imprison one trader there's always more to take up the post.

That's why the attempts at stopping the boats will always be doomed to failure.
A new approach is needed, not the same old failures.
 
Boats travelling away from the French Coast can hardly be described as risking the security of France. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:



You're interfering with the passage of innocent vessels, undoubtedly against their will. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
And you suggest the stability will be improved? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:


You have demonstrated that you do.
There's no 'seem' about it.


I fyou keep posting your absurd nonsense I'll keep proving you wrong. :ROFLMAO:
proving?
 
they do not become less stable because they are being turned around. You are welcome to lay an argument proving the reverse.
A flimsy inflatable, but undamaged boat, not in distress is likely to be damaged by attempts to interfere with it, against the wishes of its occupants.

Then it becomes in distress and the occupants lives are endangered in the process. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
That must be why boats are invariably steered from the rear? :oops::oops::oops::oops:
you don't think that might be because when a boat moves at speed, the bow isn't in the water?

Maybe you should advise people that bow thrusters are a waste of time, because its better to steer from the stern.
 
A flimsy inflatable, but undamaged boat, not in distress is likely to be damaged by attempts to interfere with it, against the wishes of its occupants.

Then it becomes in distress and the occupants lives are endangered in the process. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
why would pushing the bow damage it?
 
they are not asylum seekers until they claim asylum
Border force don’t know if they are innocent passage, illegal immigrants or asylum seekers.

To find out they would have to speak to them, at which point the people can say “I claim asylum”, if they speak good English they might even say Please.
 
Back
Top