So you prefer asylum seekers housed in hotels.Yep like I said a few months ago but wasn’t believed.

So you prefer asylum seekers housed in hotels.Yep like I said a few months ago but wasn’t believed.

Did you read the article?Yep like I said a few months ago but wasn’t believed.

I have offered no comment on it other than they should not have been in hotels in the first place. I told you the plan was to use privately owned homes months ago and you did not believe it. Proved you wrong again.So you prefer asylum seekers housed in hotels.
Yep like I said months ago the rent is paid by serco, to the home owner/landlord and the gov gives serco the money/ contract to run it all.Did you read the article?
It is privately owned, likely by an investment company. It is managed by Serco, the same group whi manage the privately owned hotels.
They have not been given the house. They are just living their in exchange for rent
To where?Just deport them, they shouldn't be here.
You never said that.I told you the plan was to use privately owned homes

Just another ill thought out rant to put on the pointless comments list.On hairy degenerate Noseall's question "[deport them] to where" the answer is: I don't care, it is not my/our responsibility
Great speech. Meaningless waffle, but (RWR) rousing all the same.. Illegal or legal immigrants have no claim on or right to any of my time, money, thoughts, freedoms, space, territory or sovereignty
No, I think we all know that as do their refugee, war-torn countryfolk. They want to be at peace at home.. They shouldn't be here.
Go to UK, boys, you get a house to live in when you arrive.
I did say itYou never said that.
In any case it is not their plan.
I am sorry you keep being wrong

Gravy train of accomodation providers and landlords, send these guys back on the next ferry each time and close all the hotels etc, and spend that money elsewhere! Or don't spend it, use it to reduce debt and avoid increasing our taxes any more!