- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,983
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Possibly, shouldn't have too long to wait.
Raynor the tax dodger
- Thread starter gas112
- Start date
Angela Rayner should also have declared she is living rent free in your head.
D-Day for Rayner? PM's adviser prepares pivotal verdict - as her lawyers deny giving tax advice
Sir Laurie Magnus is conducting an investigation into whether Angela Rayner broke ministerial rules by failing to pay the correct amount of stamp duty on a new home, and his findings could be revealed as soon as today.news.sky.com
.so she is saying she got advise from conveyancing firm and two tax lawyers. So is she lying and trying to throw a small firm under the bus if so regardless of tax owed she needs to resign
Solicitors are not tax experts and I have seen someone on the news saying they only gave advice on the facts that she told them. I assume a 'tax expert' would have known that she would still legally be an owner of the first property So far, the other two ‘experts' she claims to have consulted have not come forward. Make what you will of that.
Just this minute heard on the BBC that the specialist tax adviser firm that Rayner claims to have sought advice from have denied ever giving her any advice.
She's gotta go. Then she'll spill the beans on Starmer unless he does a deal with her. She knows where the bodies are buried….
She's gotta go. Then she'll spill the beans on Starmer unless he does a deal with her. She knows where the bodies are buried….
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,983
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Yea, she admitted that.
I’ve triggered a MAGA
Is the last bit correct?
If the trust is the owner, It’s seems odd that the parents are also owners despite having zero financial interest.
Are the parents trustees?
Are you sure you don’t mean conveyancing firm
At 6.47 this morning:
Rayner's team have refused to answer questions about who the two trust experts were - meaning we don't know whether they also have specialised knowledge of tax law, particularly around stamp duty.
She says she did
You do realise what country we live in and who we get to vote forI’ve triggered a MAGA
Ask the BBC. That’s what they said. Look, Notch, old chap. You’re trying to defend the indefensible. Give up. Accept that you’ve been conned by that 'umble northern lass who’s just shelled out £800k for a seaside flat miles from her disabled son and move on with your life.
Last edited:
What bit of "The parents remain co-owners for stamp duty purposes" don’t you understand?
She obviously lied then.
