Anti semitic attack

[SPLINE]

On why Jihad Al Shami was given bail and Lucy Connolly wasn't...

Al Shami is Tier One, Lucy Tier Two.

 

[MNW67]

Also, Jihad al Shami hadn't actually been charged with a crime!

 

[fillyboy]

Yesterday!

Why not Rudukabana, he pleaded guilty to terror charges, downloaded terror material and manufactured Ricin.

2024 Southport stabbings - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Why not the dozens of terrorism arrests every week of supporters of a proscribed terror group.

 

[fillyboy]

Also, Jihad al Shami hadn't actually been charged with a crime!

Are you taking the p155 or deliberately being a troll.

A troll in extremely bad ******g taste I might add.

 

[MNW67]

Why not Rudukabana, he pleaded guilty to terror charges, downloaded terror material and manufactured Ricin.

Why not the dozens of terrorism arrests every week of supporters of a proscribed terror group.

Rudakubana was not an Islamist nor was he convicted of a terrorist attack. We've been through this ad nauseum back in February. I'm not going over it again.

Those arrested for wearing a T-shirt did not actually attack anyone.

 

[SPLINE]

Filly see post 357 for a list, not exhaustive.

And there are all the attacks on the continent.

 

[MNW67]

Are you taking the p155 or deliberately being a troll.

A troll in extremely bad ******g taste I might add.

Are you on the booze!

He couldn't be remanded for rape because he hadn't been charged.

Just be a bit more rational.

 

[Highway Man]

Also, Jihad al Shami hadn't actually been charged with a crime!

OMG a bit difficult to charge him now, it was a terrorist attack plain and simple plotted against Jews at a synagogue.

​

 

[MNW67]

OMG a bit difficult too charge him now, it was a terrorist attack plain and simple plotted against Jews at a synagogue.

Obviously. But that's a different point. People are asking why he wasn't on remand for the alleged rape. And I have been explaining that you can't be held on remand if you haven't been charged with a crime. I am not making any sort of point. Just explaining the basic law.

 

[pete01]

Not even if he was thought to be a further risk?

Is this wrong then?

*sorry thats someone who has been charged*

 

[Highway Man]

Obviously. But that's a different point. People are asking why he wasn't on remand for the alleged rape. And I have been explaining that you can't be held on remand if you haven't been charged with a crime. I am not making any sort of point. Just explaining the basic law.

AAhh my mistake, I thought you meant charged with this attack.

 

[Highway Man]

The Manchester synagogue attacker had been arrested on suspicion of rape and released on bail before the deadly attack on Thursday.

Jihad Al-Shamie, known to be a 35-year-old British citizen of Syrian descent, was not charged with the offence.

 

[MNW67]

Not even if he was thought to be a further risk?

Is this wrong then?

He wasn't charged yet.

He was on "police bail" whilst they investigated the allegation.

You don't need to be a lawyer to get this. If you ever watch a crime drama, like Prime Suspect, you will know that the police can only hold somebody for a day or so without charging them. If they are not charged, they have to be released.

 

[fillyboy]

AAhh my mistake, I thought you meant charged with this attack.

As did I, apologies MNW.

 

[pete01]

He wasn't charged yet.

He was on "police bail" whilst they investigated the allegation.

You don't need to be a lawyer to get this. If you ever watch a crime drama, like Prime Suspect, you will know that the police can only hold somebody for a day or so without charging them. If they are not charged, they have to be released.

Yes I realised after I posted it...