You couldn't make it up, migrant "accidentally" released from jail

When you think about it, it is strange that some random politician can be given a department to head in a sector they maybe have limited experience of, if any!

Yes they have teams of folk and advisers behind the scenes who actually do the work, but even so.

MP Joe Bloggs was originally the Minister for Education before moving to Health and most recently Housing.
yes, our political system seems to be all about choosing people who's real skills are being charismatic (we elect them based on whether we believe them or like them (or at least dislike them less than their opposition)) we should have leaders who know how to do stuff. - Is this why China is doing so well ?
 
nonsense - the country is being ran by utter clowns splashing about well out of their depth, they seem to have no idea what is going on, let alone deal with anything
And do you see reform being different?

We've had a change from 14 years of Tory ruin, it takes time to turn an ocean liner
 
yes, our political system seems to be all about choosing people who's real skills are being charismatic (we elect them based on whether we believe them or like them (or at least dislike them less than their opposition)) we should have leaders who know how to do stuff. - Is this why China is doing so well ?
Until people are brave enough to hear what they don't want to, then it's what we get. We currently vote for charm as you say, and want quick fixes, but they don't work, never have.

The only way to change, as I see it, is some form of proportional representation.
 
Ah yes, the Liberal approach to problems: assemble a committee and make tea.
Fret not!
Super-Ed will swoop down to save us all!!

2734.jpg
 
Until people are brave enough to hear what they don't want to, then it's what we get. We currently vote for charm as you say, and want quick fixes, but they don't work, never have.

The only way to change, as I see it, is some form of proportional representation.
They were talking about exactly this on a news prog the other night. Because politicians are always vying for votes (new or to retain) we get all the guff, the rhetoric, the desire not to directly answer questions, the pivots, the misdirection etc.

Politicians and their parties promise the proverbial earth, get into power and deliver 10% of the promises. Another party gets in, rinse and repeat.

Mind you, when they do try to tell it as it is (didn't Labour sort of attempt this early in their current term? It'll get tougher before it gets easier) they often get feedback from the media and public for being too negative!
 
They were talking about exactly this on a news prog the other night. Because politicians are always vying for votes (new or to retain) we get all the guff, the rhetoric, the desire not to directly answer questions, the pivots, the misdirection etc.

Politicians and their parties promise the proverbial earth, get into power and deliver 10% of the promises. Another party gets in, rinse and repeat.

Mind you, when they do try to tell it as it is (didn't Labour sort of attempt this early in their current term? It'll get tougher before it gets easier) they often get feedback from the media and public for being too negative!


Which is why I believe that our adversarial, FPTP system has had its day (if it ever had a day).

ALL politicians agreeing to work together, for the betterment of the country.

Some however only want to serve their mates and some, only to serve themselves.
 
Until people are brave enough to hear what they don't want to, then it's what we get.
People moan about lying politicians, but you indeed get what you vote for...

For many people it's a case of which liar suits them best!

Because as you say they don't want to hear the truth...

They also want to be continually reassured that it's not their fault - it's someone else to blame...

Anyone 'different' seems to be the go to target as it's much too easy to blame johnny/jane foreigner ;)
 
Until people are brave enough to hear what they don't want to, then it's what we get. We currently vote for charm as you say, and want quick fixes, but they don't work, never have.

The only way to change, as I see it, is some form of proportional representation.
Same nonsense though - people voting for those they find charismatic, or in my case voting for the candidate most likely to keep out the one I dislike.

neither tactics seem to be votes for people who are highly skilled in running a country
 
Maybe, just maybe, WE have the combined skills to run the country? The DIY Not Forum Party?

If we get in, can I be Minister for the Betterment of Bikinis for Women? It's a brief I'd be very keen to get to grips with!
 
Same nonsense though - people voting for those they find charismatic, or in my case voting for the candidate most likely to keep out the one I dislike.

neither tactics seem to be votes for people who are highly skilled in running a country
What's your choice, dictatorship ?

No party is ever going to be the right 1 for everyone, that's the beauty of democracy
 
Oh look - aveatry indulges in peurile name calling in place of intelligent debate.

I wonder why...
 
Back
Top