• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have been pointing it out for ages. On what they report, how they report and what they dont report.
no you havent

you just repeated the lazy argument "oh you wont see that reported in the MMS / BBC ..............where is it virtually always widely reported


your news sources are not reliable -the other day you linked to a youtube video of somebody criticising net zero, the somebody is transpires was connected to climate change misinformation think tanks.


I suggest you get yer own house in order before criticise the trustworthy BBC
 
how did it not age well?

what do you think has changed?

the evidence shows Trump did incite the Jan 6th riots.

the BBC is still a trustworthy news source
Trumps opponents studied every second of what he said in the whole and line by line and found NOTHING they could stick on him. -- The BBC found something though -- by making it up.
 
no you havent

you just repeated the lazy argument "oh you wont see that reported in the MMS / BBC ..............where is it virtually always widely reported


your news sources are not reliable -the other day you linked to a youtube video of somebody criticising net zero, the somebody is transpires was connected to climate change misinformation think tanks.


I suggest you get yer own house in order before criticise the trustworthy BBC
A utube vid is not news.
For the record I get my news from many places - I dont read the mail and I dont have an auntie on Facebook and GB news is not a news channel. Before you start with your nonsense.
 
Bbc put too much football in the sports section for me! Lol
 
My position on here is that Orangina is a skid-mark on the office of POTUS in particular and humanity in general and, despite any weaselling and chicanery from his acolytes, bootlickers, and lackies, he did whip up his MAGA mouthbreathers.
Something he does to this day.
Hear, hear!
 
As someone's just alluded to on a tv prog this morning, usually when a broadcaster does tv articles with parts of a speech edited together, they include a brief blank screen or whatever between the edits to indicate sections might have been omitted.

They didn't do this with the Trump speech, one has to assume intentionally.

Still though, I'd assert we do away with the BBC at our peril. Or maybe people want something like GB-BBC, I'm sure it would be completely balanced and impartial at all times ...
 
There's a lot of people not understanding the difference between the news being reported and a separate program.

They got the panorama program badly wrong. But it doesnt alter the news reporting at the time

Those facts are still out there. Just very badly presented years after the event
 
There's a lot of people not understanding the difference between the news being reported and a separate program.

They got the panorama program badly wrong. But it doesnt alter the news reporting at the time

Those facts are still out there. Just very badly presented years after the event
Even news can get distorted and biased...
 
Being British, I'm "Very cross" with the BBC.
Trump is justified in his seeking financial redress.
 
Makes me laugh when BBC news quotes a foreign news report as being from a "state sponsored news channel"
 
Just getting it clear.
On a scale of trustworthiness though, the BBC is light-years ahead of many sources.
Trust Social doesn't even make it onto the rejected list.

FWIW, I agree that the BBC got this one very wrong.
Also FWIW, I hope they learn from this: if a reality check every now and again is needed to maintain or improve standards, that's a good thing in my book.


Also, as regard to any conspiracy theory, your reading of my position is way off the mark.
If you can show me how you came to that conclusion, I'd appreciate it (y)

My position on here is that Orangina is a skid-mark on the office of POTUS in particular and humanity in general and, despite any weaselling and chicanery from his acolytes, bootlickers, and lackies, he did whip up his MAGA mouthbreathers.
Something he does to this day.
Maybe. But that is a long way short.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top