• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

Status
Not open for further replies.
And that’s the problem. You carman, Notch etc hate Trump so much that you cannot see the problem when a supposedly unbiased, impartial BBC shows that they aren’t. Nobody has defended him beyond the facts. He did not incite a violent uprising. The BBC have apologised for creating the “misleading” edit.
Pure rubbish
 
So the BBC were wrong to apologise for giving the mistaken impression that Trump made a direct call for violence? According to you he did?

“However, we accept that our edit unintentionally created the impression that we were showing a single continuous section of the speech, rather than excerpts from different points in the speech, and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.

The BBC would like to apologise to President Trump for that error of judgement.”
Try reading that out and understand it's meaning
 
must be difficult for the far left trump haters to now have one of their main sources of information admitting they have been lying about him. They have all been taken as complete gullible fools
 
All that apology does is recognise the political world is obscured by the Big Lie trump/Giuliani cooked up between them on the night it was confirmed Biden had won the 2020 election. They have to recognise this distasteful 'truth' while he remains POTUS - a President who uses his financial and political leverage to twist reality to his advantage. Trump has already shut down Colbert and Kimmel in the US and the BeeB clearly want to avoid a lengthy legal wrangle.
 
must be difficult for the far left trump haters to now have one of their main sources of information admitting they have been lying about him. They have all been taken as complete gullible fools
It's actually not difficult to separate 2 issues about him.

A bad edit, panorama. They have apologised for it, and so they should.

The actual news and information at the time. And all the subsequent analysis where he encouraged the actions taken.

Only the rwr are trying to say it didn't happen
 
Try reading that out and understand it's meaning
“and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.”

It’s so clear to anyone with half a brain.

Did the Trump make a direct call for violence? No that was a mistaken impression given by the edit.

You either agree or you are saying their correction is wrong.

They didn’t even qualify it. They apologised for giving the mistaken impression that Trump had made a direct call for violence.
 
“and that this gave the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.”

It’s so clear to anyone with half a brain.

Did the Trump make a direct call for violence? No that was a mistaken impression given by the edit.

You either agree or you are saying their correction is wrong.

They didn’t even qualify it. They apologised for giving the mistaken impression that Trump had made a direct call for violence.
Why are you continually conflating 2 different issues.

It's a good job you are not 1 of the beeb lawyers. You'd have paid him money by now
 
It's actually not difficult to separate 2 issues about him.

A bad edit, panorama. They have apologised for it, and so they should.

The actual news and information at the time. And all the subsequent analysis where he encouraged the actions taken.

Only the rwr are trying to say it didn't happen
i think you have been overly hoodwinked on many things
 
i think you have been overly hoodwinked on many things
Maybe, but not on recognising 2 distinct differences.

The beeb is a good news source, easily checked by comparing other news outlets as news is "current news".

They got a program edit wrong. Not the actual news.

So who is misled? Me? Or you and the others supporting him and running the beeb down ?
 
Why are you continually conflating 2 different issues.

It's a good job you are not 1 of the beeb lawyers. You'd have paid him money by now
Shyster lawyers are enjoying the feeding frenzy; following Trump like gulls. Opportunities like this don't come along often. Folk like 'biking and the trolls are just the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top