Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

[noseall]

As reported by the establishment media.

Yes.
They also reported that the Trump riots were a culmination of weeks of ‘stolen election’ lies, being drummed into the hard of thinking, in order to get them riled up. It worked. On the day of the riots, many of those convicted of rioting admitted they were already up for the fight, having been brainwashed by the orange rapist leading up to his riot speech.

Mislead my arse

 

[Highway Man]

That just proves you are defending him “beyond the facts”

He did incite a violent uprising.

Congress voted a majority to say it was insurrection
Courts / judges stated it was insurrection
Numerous investigations and reports state it was insurrection

You can stamp your little feet as much as you like. FACT. He did NOT incite violence or an uprising of any kind. Because a few vigilante types went to Capitol Hill was not his fault. He actually calmed things down. You’re welcome.

 

[Highway Man]

Don't use the Lords name in vain

It’s ok Pete. I am used to it.

 

[motorbiking]

You're taking it out of context as you always do. It's not a closed question like you are trying to make it

The context is the statement they made, the correction was due to the mistake.

There are 2 parts to the situation, why, as a world class lawyer, can you not see it?

There are no two parts to the situation. There is an edit that they felt gave the mistaken impression that Trump made a direct call for violence. The correction is clear

We all know why. Trump mania makes you blind

odds managed to answer the question. He says they were wrong to make the correction.

Do you agree with their text yes or no?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

The context is the statement they made, the correction was due to the mistake.

There are no two parts to the situation. There is an edit that they felt gave the mistaken impression that Trump made a direct call for violence. The correction is clear

odds managed to answer the question. He says they were wrong to make the correction.

Do you agree with their text yes or no?

It's not a closed question.

Try again with a bit more openness.

You deliberately conflate 2 different things. Either because of a lack of understanding or just trying to appear clever.

 

[blup]

I think they need to be split in to a core service and a subscription service. I am quite happy not to consume the licensable content. I miss Dragons Den and I'd miss radio 4 if I needed a licence for it. But I don't my LBC/news radio as an alternative and have plenty of pod casts for long drives.

People complain about the licence fee but would be paying many times over for a subscription service

 

[blup]

Meanwhile re form’s mate is turning the screw, mapping our undersea cables

Russian spy ship pointed lasers at RAF pilots tracking it, says Healey - BBC News

John Healey says the vessel is in waters north of Scotland and is being monitored by UK forces.

www.bbc.co.uk

An investigation into Russian money funding the toreys and leave campaigns is long overdue

 

[motorbiking]

People complain about the licence fee but would be paying many times over for a subscription service

Or it would cut its cloth accordingly and compete.

 

[motorbiking]

It's not a closed question.

Try again with a bit more openness.

You deliberately conflate 2 different things. Either because of a lack of understanding or just trying to appear clever.

You are pretending there are two different things. There is one question to answer.

It seems beyond you. You either agree with the correction or you don’t.

 

[motorbiking]

Meanwhile re form’s mate is turning the screw, mapping our undersea cables

Russian spy ship pointed lasers at RAF pilots tracking it, says Healey - BBC News

John Healey says the vessel is in waters north of Scotland and is being monitored by UK forces.

www.bbc.co.uk

An investigation into Russian money funding the toreys and leave campaigns is long overdue

It was apparently not in our waters.

Perhaps a container ship could accidentally drop some submerged containers in its path.

They make a mess of any ships steering and propulsion

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You are pretending there are two different things. There is one question to answer.

It seems beyond you. You either agree with the correction or you don’t.

I keep saying there are 2 parts to it, because there are.

You can either understand it or keep on with your closed questions

You are not the Beebs lawyer, they seem less concerned than you do. I don't wonder why

 

[SPLINE]

If Donald's speech was truly intended to cause violence why did the beeb need to doctor it?

 

[motorbiking]

I keep saying there are 2 parts to it, because there are.

You can either understand it or keep on with your closed questions

You are not the Beebs lawyer, they seem less concerned than you do. I don't wonder why

The question that you have been asked is do you agree or disagree with the correction, the beeb have published.

It's really simple - you read the text, you form an opinion and you give your answer.

There is no right or wrong answer - it's your opinion.

 

[motorbiking]

If Donald's speech was truly intended to cause violence why did the beeb need to doctor it?

and then apologise for doing so.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

The question that you have been asked is do you agree or disagree with the correction, the beeb have published.

It's really simple - you read the text, you form an opinion and you give your answer.

There is no right or wrong answer - it's your opinion.

The question you keep asking is closed and doesn't cover the full situation

Have you stopped beating your wife? Yes or no ?