- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 24,756
- Reaction score
- 5,333
- Country

Because silence has a value.It was at worst a narrow technical editing misjudgement.
Why? If it’s gross misconduct then surely a straightforward instant dismissal.


Because silence has a value.It was at worst a narrow technical editing misjudgement.
Why? If it’s gross misconduct then surely a straightforward instant dismissal.

Exactly thatYou like Trump, Farage, Johnson
your judgement of the BBC or anything else shall be taken in that context

Not if the NDA is known to exist it doesntBecause silence has a value.

Don’t be daftNot if the NDA is known to exist it doesnt

The whole idea of an NDA is being kept quiet.Don’t be daft
That's an NSD.Not so daft
Motorgrifting reads the Daily Telemail, supports Farage and Trump, has the temerity to accuse the BBC of being untrustworthy.Because silence has a value.

And Johnson too don't forget.Motorgrifting reads the Daily Telemail, supports Farage and Trump, has the temerity to accuse the BBC of being untrustworthy.

No the idea is to secure non disclosure. If only the clue was in the name.The whole idea of an NDA is being kept quiet.
Not so daft

Nonsense and lies from the forum peddler of nonsense and lies.Motorgrifting reads the Daily Telemail, supports Farage and Trump, has the temerity to accuse the BBC of being untrustworthy.
Especially when accompanied by a glowing referenceBecause silence has a value.
Johnson, who was described by witnesses at the Co vid inquiry as incoherent, and reacts by labelling the inquiry incoherent.Johnson

He did raise some interesting arguments.Johnson, who was described by witnesses at the Co vid inquiry as incoherent, and reacts by labelling the inquiry incoherent.

And once it's known there's an NDA in place, it's only a matter of time.No the idea is to secure non disclosure. If only the clue was in the name.
He fiddled while Rome burned.He did raise some interesting arguments.