At last leaders with balls...

Your posts suggest otherwise ;)

However, if you believe the Greenlandic people would be wise to sever their ties with Denmark and become part of the US...

Would you call Falkland Islanders stupid to retain their ties to a country half a globe away?

It's got nothing to do with distance, Greenlanders would have immeasurable benefits from becomming American citizens.

But let's just go back to your glaring hypocrisy. Ever since Notchy voted away your freedom of movement rights in 2016 you've been having a decade long sulk/rant about it. However, when I suggest that others in another country would benefit from freedom of movement you start insulting me for even suggesting it. Isn't this typical lefty/liberal hypocisy and double standards of the type that I've been highlighting for a very long time? You want FOM for yourself, but would deny it and the immeasurable benefits it brings to others. Irony off the scale!! :rolleyes:
 
Interesting that you brought that up...

Just before Argentina invaded the British government were involved in discussions around sovereignty and selling Las Malvinas...
She lured Argentina like a fisherman would persuade a fish to take the hook?


Then thatcher saw the chance of becoming a war leader and boosting her chances of re-election, which was a successful ploy...
Or she could have let Argentina take the Islands.
No different from another tory leader who called a referendum in order to hold onto power...
He was as blind as you are. If you can smell roses then just check that its not air freshener.

Camoron of course got it wrong, hence the disastrous position we find ourselves in now...
It was air freshener he could smell.
He did after all predict a war, and it looks like the seeds were indeed sown in 2016!
He did as I pointed out to you the other day.
 
Last edited:
It's got nothing to do with distance, Greenlanders would have immeasurable benefits from becomming American citizens.

But let's just go back to your glaring hypocrisy.

Indeed:

Puerto Ricans voted not to become a state of the union - Native Americans weren't given that choice.
 
It's got nothing to do with distance, Greenlanders would have immeasurable benefits from becomming American citizens.

But let's just go back to your glaring hypocrisy. Ever since Notchy voted away your freedom of movement rights in 2016 you've been having a decade long sulk/rant about it. However, when I suggest that others in another country would benefit from freedom of movement you start insulting me for even suggesting it. Isn't this typical lefty/liberal hypocisy and double standards of the type that I've been highlighting for a very long time? You want FOM for yourself, but would deny it and the immeasurable benefits it brings to others. Irony off the scale!! :rolleyes:
So Greenland can't have sovereignty?

What does nato mean then ?
 
Back
Top