- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 14,403
- Reaction score
- 8,559
- Country

Men in white coats for yourself.More like the flying squad for HM

Men in white coats for yourself.More like the flying squad for HM
Flying squad, cherry picker. Forget it….Men in white coats for yourself.

yep it went over my headFlying squad, cherry picker. Forget it….
I take at face value that HM served in some capacity, but inconsistencies have arisen from his own account which make it the business of the forum.

I get the feeling he is on a wind up, at least I hope so.Nonsense
It’s none of your bussiness
![]()
I hoped we were next on the list.
Your posts suggest otherwise
However, if you believe the Greenlandic people would be wise to sever their ties with Denmark and become part of the US...
Would you call Falkland Islanders stupid to retain their ties to a country half a globe away?

December 27 to be exactA bold claim from someone who 'joined' a couple o' weeks ago.
Fast reader, are you?

She lured Argentina like a fisherman would persuade a fish to take the hook?Interesting that you brought that up...
Just before Argentina invaded the British government were involved in discussions around sovereignty and selling Las Malvinas...
Or she could have let Argentina take the Islands.Then thatcher saw the chance of becoming a war leader and boosting her chances of re-election, which was a successful ploy...
He was as blind as you are. If you can smell roses then just check that its not air freshener.No different from another tory leader who called a referendum in order to hold onto power...
It was air freshener he could smell.Camoron of course got it wrong, hence the disastrous position we find ourselves in now...
He did as I pointed out to you the other day.He did after all predict a war, and it looks like the seeds were indeed sown in 2016!
It's got nothing to do with distance, Greenlanders would have immeasurable benefits from becomming American citizens.

So Greenland can't have sovereignty?It's got nothing to do with distance, Greenlanders would have immeasurable benefits from becomming American citizens.
But let's just go back to your glaring hypocrisy. Ever since Notchy voted away your freedom of movement rights in 2016 you've been having a decade long sulk/rant about it. However, when I suggest that others in another country would benefit from freedom of movement you start insulting me for even suggesting it. Isn't this typical lefty/liberal hypocisy and double standards of the type that I've been highlighting for a very long time? You want FOM for yourself, but would deny it and the immeasurable benefits it brings to others. Irony off the scale!!![]()

Greenland is not actually a member of NATO itself, it simply enjoys NATO protection through security guarantees.So Greenland can't have sovereignty?
What does nato mean then ?

Part of DenmarkGreenland is not actually a member of NATO itself, it simply enjoys NATO protection through security guarantees.

But is self governing,Part of Denmark

And ?But is self governing,