Bus driver sacked OMG

[King Billy]

How much time on his hands in his Mum's bedroom must Himmy have? Jeez! Unending pages of multiquotes, guff and lefty waffle from his multiple schizo usernames - benefitting insomniacs and no one else. Thankfully ignore also saves having to scroll down past all this bilge.

Hysterical that the saddo will immediately pounce on this and have a reply in a nanosecond. Even though I can no longer read his garbage.

If you have a complaint about me, you can either address your concerns to the mods or Admin. or you can address them directly to me.
A nebulous reference to some mythical person is hardly an example of good behaviour of a serious complainant.
Judging by your numerous references to hordes of immigrants, I think you lack the courage of your convictions to complain about, or to, a genuine person. Is it because thay are able to respond?

 

[JohnD]

Dec 27 accused Morqthana of taking the sides of criminals.
Morqthana quite justifiably asked Dec27 to present some evidence to support the accusation.

And he didn't.

 

[noseall]

No it isn't,

I guess if chicken biker insists on making himself look a knob, so be it.

 

[pete01]

So he said, and not supported by the CCTV.

Why would he lie, he knew 50 people on the bus were probably watching aswell?

 

[Dec27]

Dec 27 accused Morqthana of taking the sides of criminals.
Morqthana quite justifiably asked Dec27 to present some evidence to support the accusation.

Dec27 admitted he didn't read Morqthana's posts.

I wonder if he had to attend casualty for the shotgun injury to his foot.

What new jibberish now ?

 

[johnny2007]

How much time on his hands in his Mum's bedroom must Himmy have? Jeez! Unending pages of multiquotes, guff and lefty waffle from his multiple schizo usernames - benefitting insomniacs and no one else. Thankfully ignore also saves having to scroll down past all this bilge.

Hysterical that the saddo will immediately pounce on this and have a reply in a nanosecond. Even though I can no longer read his garbage.

He's not in his bedroom.
He's in a mental institution's library, glued to a computer, shuffling between accounts on internet forums.

 

[motorbiking]

I actually edited my post a bit.

I believe they need to show that their interpretation fell within a reasonable range of interpretations.

yep100%. - it just seems odd.

???

MBK and I were just trying to get our heads around the judge's reasoning at the tribunal. We weren't even arguing.

Having had a think about it. I suspect they had enough ground irrelevant of the force used. So it didn’t materially change anything.

 

[Odds]

yep100%. - it just seems odd.
Having had a think about it. I suspect they had enough ground irrelevant of the force used. So it didn’t materially change anything.

27 - gonna go for the record?

 

[King Billy]

What new jibberish now ?

You voluntarily became involved in a discussion not of your making.
The right-wingers gathering round to support their gibberish tried to confuse the situation a bit.
But if you follow it carefully, you'll see the thread of the discussion.
I'll explain it for the hard of thinking.

R&C accused 'all the liberals' of taking the criminal's side.

As usual, all liberals out in force - putting a lot of effort into being on the wrong side. The criminal's side.

Morqthana asked R&C to show where

You can show posts here where people have taken "the criminal's side" can you?
No - of course you can't.

Elsa TLC wanted to get involved

Every word you say.

Morqthana responded to Elsa, saying it won't be hard for him to show the evidence, and he correctly said that it was impossible to provide a rational analysis of such comments.

Then it won't be hard for you to show at least some words of mine, accompanied by an intelligent and rational analysis of them which shows how I'm taking the side of the criminal will it.
Except of course, you can't do that, can you? You will fail to even try to prove it, despite how desperately you would like it to be true.

Then Elsa started the usual gobbledegook.

Just go backwards from this post.
Back that way.
Do you drive a moped?
Is that when you dont talk boIIocks?

My comment was directed at R&C, Elsa, and you, and I have now quoted all the posts, in chronological order to help you follow the thread.

R&C accused Morqthana of taking the sides of criminals.
Morqthana quite justifiably asked him to present some evidence to support the accusation.

Then you wrote that there's no point in looking back into Morqthana's posts, which is an admission that some right-wingers don't read his comments.

Your posts are long and boring. What’s the point ?

Therefore R&C accused 'the liberals' of taking the side of the criminals.
Elsa joined in with gibberish, and eventually you implied that people like you, R&C and Elsa don't read his posts anyway. So how can R&C, Elsa or you accuse 'the Liberals' of taking the side of criminals

Dec27 admitted he didn't read Morqthana's posts.
I wonder if he had to attend casualty for the shotgun injury to his foot.

How's your foot? Or is it still in you mouth?

 

[motorbiking]

I guess if chicken biker insists on making himself look a knob, so be it.

I was happy to explain it to you. But you keep posting the same incorrect opinion that doesn’t even feature in your “care guide” that you claim to be the source. I think your AI has confused you again.

Your new additional source, which I already posted when I directed you to the BB barrister channel is also in the context of defending against intruders. There is a part that is relevant, but you haven’t posted that bit. Nothing in the document suggests what you have claimed, in relation to use of force in performing an arrest or stopping a crime.

 

[motorbiking]

27 - gonna go for the record?

Sorry have you started a new thread with 10 of your own replies that nobody is interested in?

 

[King Billy]

Having had a think about it. I suspect they had enough ground irrelevant of the force used. So it didn’t materially change anything.

The tribunal was not about the force used. It was about the fairness of the dismissal. In that process it decided that the dismissal based on the dereliction of duty, and the spectacle of a representative of the company fighting in the street, was not unfair.

 

[King Billy]

I was happy to explain it to you.

You kept presenting your interpretation of the law, which was incorrect.

 

[Odds]

Sorry have you started a new thread with 10 of your own replies that nobody is interested in?

they're read, but folk are too afraid to comment and become a target for trolls.

 

[motorbiking]

they're read, but folk are too afraid to comment and become a target for trolls.