Sorry, but this is important.

Doesn't mean that because they legally recognise the stupidity of a 3rd gender doesn't make it right
Because someone wants to be seen as a dog doesn't make it right, but they continue in their quest to be recognised as a dog.
 
Given you plenty of examples that I notice you have completely ignored but cherry picked the ones that you feel that you have an argument by twisting the very clear definition and characteristics that I gave.
You did give some characteristics, let me deal with each one:
a woman has two X chromasones and a male has XY chromosones,
not always true nor accurate, and is not usually tested on babies a few hours old.

a woman has larger hips for child birth so you need to look at the skeleton.
We're talking about babies s few hours old.

it is simple to know the difference.
I'm asking you to define the differences, and I've been asking you for days, and so far we have:
must menstruate
must be able to give birth (naturally)
Must have larger hips
must have XX chromasones

None of that is descernable at birth.
So despite the simplicity (according to you) you are unable to tell us what characteristics a woman must have to be a woman.


You may struggle to know the differences, I dont,
A man may think he is a woman but that is all in his head. The biological differences cannot be hidden
So you can easily tell me what characteristics, visible at birth, that are used to declare the infant a female?
 
It isn't babies. that are attempting to access women only facilities so don't concern yourself over this.
It is babies that were and are assigned a sex at birth. It is those people that did grow up to be believe they were incorrectly assigned at birth.
it is those babies that are now adults that believe they are a woman.
You didn't think that they remained as babies for the rest of their lives, did you?
 
They use the mens facilities during this process. That is what they are.
OK, for several years, while they are transitioning, from male to female, which invariably includes adopting the female dress attire, they continue to use the male facilities until the transitioning process is complete.
Do you think it's safe for someone, to all intents and purposes to use the male facilities?

Now what about those women transitioning to male? Does the same apply? Do they, appearing as a man, continue to use the women's facilities, for several years until their transitioning is complete?
 
Im a lover not a fighter.
You previously admitted to being prepared to resort to violence.
Are you lying now, or were you lying then?
Your answer is superfluous because you've demonstrated that you're willing to lie to suit the circumstances, to put you in the light you think is better.
 
You previously admitted to being prepared to resort to violence.
Are you lying now, or were you lying then?
Your answer is superfluous because you've demonstrated that you're willing to lie to suit the circumstances, to put you in the light you think is better.
I never lie
 
You did give some characteristics, let me deal with each one:

not always true nor accurate, and is not usually tested on babies a few hours old.


We're talking about babies s few hours old.


I'm asking you to define the differences, and I've been asking you for days, and so far we have:
must menstruate
must be able to give birth (naturally)
Must have larger hips
must have XX chromasones

None of that is descernable at birth.
So despite the simplicity (according to you) you are unable to tell us what characteristics a woman must have to be a woman.




So you can easily tell me what characteristics, visible at birth, that are used to declare the infant a female?

It is babies that were and are assigned a sex at birth. It is those people that did grow up to be believe they were incorrectly assigned at birth.
it is those babies that are now adults that believe they are a woman.
You didn't think that they remained as babies for the rest of their lives, did you?

OK, for several years, while they are transitioning, from male to female, which invariably includes adopting the female dress attire, they continue to use the male facilities until the transitioning process is complete.
Do you think it's safe for someone, to all intents and purposes to use the male facilities?

Now what about those women transitioning to male? Does the same apply? Do they, appearing as a man, continue to use the women's facilities, for several years until their transitioning is complete?

You previously admitted to being prepared to resort to violence.
Are you lying now, or were you lying then?
Your answer is superfluous because you've demonstrated that you're willing to lie to suit the circumstances, to put you in the light you think is better.

Your posting history says otherwise.

You post very much like the OP “Exactly”. It’s a little bit sad imho.

Men and women are identified biologically at birth. A sex change can change that I suppose. But putting a dress on and tucking your plums in doesn’t make you a women.
 
So is thinking your a dog. I think suffering from therianism or otherkinism is more serious than wanting to change gender.
Discuss it with you Veterinarian. They might be prepared to offer some surgery to reduce the number of legs you have, and show you how to walk upright.
Woof!!!
 
Back
Top