Police officer defends Christian preacher in Whitechapel

1772058984563.png
 
Yes I am correct.

Go on then - I'll waste a few pixels by asking you to quote where that document agrees with

"It isnt a union jack, that is only when it is at sea"

And you of course will engage in your traditional denial, dissembling, and repetitions of claims which you know are false, but which you have to keep making because the alternative of admitting that you were wrong is just to awful to bear.
 
Go on then - I'll waste a few pixels by asking you to quote where that document agrees with

"It isnt a union jack, that is only when it is at sea"

And you of course will engage in your traditional denial, dissembling, and repetitions of claims which you know are false, but which you have to keep making because the alternative of admitting that you were wrong is just to awful to bear.
Your pretty wound up by something you know nothing about, but that's typical morqthana who doesnt mind looking a fool.
 
It is common knowledge that it is the union flag on land and union jack on a naval ship. The rule was relaxed by people like yourself but not by those in the know. So back to your version, you going to tell us or do you realise that you are on a hiding to nothing.
 
Sometime around 1674 the British flag became formally known as the ‘Union Jack’ when mounted on a warship and the ship was not in harbour. At the same time the British flag was referred to as the ‘Union flag’ on land. This rule was relaxed by the early nineteen century when the sailing term could be used when referring to the national flag everywhere.
 
Sometime around 1674 the British flag became formally known as the ‘Union Jack’ when mounted on a warship and the ship was not in harbour. At the same time the British flag was referred to as the ‘Union flag’ on land. This rule was relaxed by the early nineteen century when the sailing term could be used when referring to the national flag everywhere.

Yes, we all know that - it was in the link you provided, and I helpfully already quoted it.

It isnt a union jack, that is only when it is at sea, it is a union flag. Think on...

How ironic, that someone who professes to care so much about it knows so little about it.
 
I said did ask you, politely, to use intelligence and reason.

Surely you are capable of that?

What you wrote there was neither a definition of "woke" nor an analysis of MNW67's post which shows that an accusation that he hates the UK is justified.

Please try again, only this time do it using intelligence and reason.
Two things you seriously lack!!! Your posts prove that..
 
So someone with a "Hamas scalf wrapped around his face, in Manchester, stamping on the British flag shouting 'Alla Akbar' (sic)", equates to people like King Billy not giving a flying f... about this country.
Could you explain that please, and do so with intelligence and reason.
Please define "woke".
And also please explain, with intelligence and reason, why me asking you what you would have liked the police to do leads you do think I hate the UK.
Don't forget about your own warning. ;)
 
Back
Top