UFOs

Every single one of your comments here is clear indication that you have not watched the vid section in question.
Wasting your time, he is hell bent on it not being a UFO and will argue until he is blue in the face..I as others have seen it and it is very interesting
 
Wasting your time, he is hell bent on it not being a UFO and will argue until he is blue in the face..I as others have seen it and it is very interesting
What you see as argument can also be perceived as an honest opinion from a different pov to yours....an argument is not necessarily being contrary for the sake of it but a genuine comment offering a broader perspective within the framework of discussion.


...and on the subject of perception; i wonder what you saw in post #259 to prompt a response in post #260?
 
What you see as argument can also be perceived as an honest opinion from a different pov to yours....an argument is not necessarily being contrary for the sake of it but a genuine comment offering a broader perspective within the framework of discussion.


...and on the subject of perception; i wonder what you saw in post #259 to prompt a response in post #260?
There is a way to put your point across and argue your point in a non patronising way, IT Minion does not have this skill set and is well known for the lack of it.
My response to you was based upon you taking the mick with your picture that you posted which was an obvious provocative post designed to offend or derail a thread into ridicule rather than believing that was a genuine alien walking around. I am sure you do not believe that there are aliens walking around dressed like that, therefore you are simply monkeying around a serious thread.
 
There is a way to put your point across and argue your point in a non patronising way, IT Minion does not have this skill set and is well known for the lack of it.

IYO.

My response to you was based upon you taking the mick with your picture that you posted which was an obvious provocative post designed to offend or derail a thread into ridicule rather than believing that was a genuine alien walking around. I am sure you do not believe that there are aliens walking around dressed like that, therefore you are simply monkeying around a serious thread.

I posted a picture of an alien in a thread about UFOs.

Yours is meant to be an insult....

Which i don't find insulting, by the way.

Thanks for the avatar.:mrgreen:
 
Why was your original post deleted, by the way - i didn't ask a mod to do so; did you?
I didn't no. It wasn't meant as an insult. Someone obviously thought it was who did, and I know exactly who it was but I don't offend easily so I didn't mind.
 
I did, you've got to be particularly desperate to believe in UFOs to make that jump. But please let me know what you think this supposed object is doing, orbiting or not orbiting?
Ah I see what this is - you are just arguing the toz over the word orbiting.
So you agree that it is an object.
No it is not orbiting it appears to be stationary. It seems to be above the earth because it can also be seen later in the distance as the starship is further around its semi orbit.
If in its first appearance it was actually thousands of miles away from earth and it just looked like it was above earth then as the starship moved around the earth it would look like it gets closer to the atmosphere as the earth covers it. But it doesn’t, it stays in the same "height" above the earth
 
It could be the booster and ship separation plume. But if you look at the 4k broadcast on a big 4k tv you can see that the "object" or "plume" is very angular in nature, that seems to cast a shadow upon itself from the sun on the right. It does not look anything like a plume.
Also a plume would not stay stationary as the plume is blasted out at massive speed.

The other thing is I have watched every one of the test flights and the commentary from space ex is usually pretty good as they explain what you are seeing but in this instance - deathly silence - nothing. I would have expected something like "and as starship is in glide mode you can still see the separation plume in the distance"
 
Last edited:
So you agree that it is an objec
Don't be stupid, it is lense flare, I'm just entering your delusions. You think it's hovering?
If in its first appearance it was actually thousands of miles away from earth
Thousands of miles away? That makes no sense. It would be the size of a moon to appear that big. It would also be above the continental United States. Its amazing how no one else saw it.
But it doesn’t, it stays in the same "height" above the earth
No, it gets closer to earth as the angle of the sun changes with respect to the starship, exactly as you would expect for a lense flare moving as the light source moves.
 
Don't be stupid, it is lense flare, I'm just entering your delusions. You think it's hovering?
You are not looking at the right object - you cant be there is lens flare there for sure but this is not lens flare. Lens flare does not appear from behind something like this object does.
Thousands of miles away? That makes no sense. It would be the size of a moon to appear that big. It would also be above the continental United States. Its amazing how no one else saw it.
Thousands - hundreds, whatever I was just making a distinction between "above" the earth and some distance away - in the background as it were. As for size - difficult to say. You mean no one else on earth looking up into the sky didn’t see it from the ground - no they would not be able to see it from the ground.
No, it gets closer to earth as the angle of the sun changes with respect to the starship, exactly as you would expect for a lense flare moving as the light source moves.
That is not what is happening at 8.50 to 9.07.
 
Last edited:
Don't be stupid, it is lense flare, I'm just entering your delusions. You think it's hovering?

Thousands of miles away? That makes no sense. It would be the size of a moon to appear that big. It would also be above the continental United States. Its amazing how no one else saw it.

No, it gets closer to earth as the angle of the sun changes with respect to the starship, exactly as you would expect for a lense flare moving as the light source moves.
You are addressing an individual that believes in chem trails.

Give it up.
 
Back
Top