If you had used a firearm recently then you would expect many hundreds if not thousands of explosive residue particles to be on your clothing but to find just one probably means he didn't fire the gun and it just got blown there on the wind.
You should be made to prove innocence rather than lack of evidence to convict.
You hadn't thought that one through had you
Can you prove that you didn't kill Jill Dando?
I can -for instance- prove I was not in London that day so thus exclude myself from the inquiries
I would expect he could too, it's really not that difficult these days
Cheers
Richard
You should be made to prove innocence rather than lack of evidence to convict.
You hadn't thought that one through had you
Can you prove that you didn't kill Jill Dando?
I can -for instance- prove I was not in London that day so thus exclude myself from the inquiries
I would expect he could too, it's really not that difficult these days
Cheers
Richard
But there are many thousands that can't prove where they were on that day (including me) does that make them all suspects?
Is my point.
I haven't really cared for him since Karma Chameleon
I think you will find the paperwork has been damaged by 20 years of rainOn the roof of my office are all the job sheets dating back to 1987.
Actually I think it was because of the judge's mental illness.I believe he was always innocent and had been wrongfully sentenced because of his mental illness.
As for George, the man was convicted of attempted rape, stalking several women and posed in photos holding guns.
This isnt your everyday simpleton they've accused. Guilty of murder or not. Id rather he was still in prison.
No.ignore this post
I think you will find the paperwork has been damaged by 20 years of rainOn the roof of my office are all the job sheets dating back to 1987.
Why not?The evidence against George was completly circumstantial, the fire arm residue was 1,000 of an inch in diameter, but he shouldn't be allowed to sell his story to the papers.