- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
I think fag-end woodbine sees himself as a rational thinking person, but in reality he is an extremist, a right wing version of extreme xenophobia.
They're At It Again!
- Thread starter woodbine
- Start date
Sponsored Links
He's nothing but a question dodging wannabe. Clueless and full of wind and pi$$.
And your contribution is to stand on the sidelines, giving abuse to anyone who makes any suggestions or dares to say how it is. But then that's all you have to offer........zilch. Boyo.
Last edited:
As usual, you can't see the difference, but I'll explain it for others who are more likely to be able to grasp the situation.
There have always been people in societies who are unbalanced and commit mass shootings, etc as occasionally happens in The US as well as other acts of violence. They are normally alone or rarely more than one. However, the islamic threat is a worldwide terror franchise that is highly organised, whether it is abusing young white girls, going to fight for ISIS or squashing women children and babies with articulated lorries. The races normally involved in these acts of terror seem to be disposed to being 'radicalised' in a way that caucasians aren't. The mix of volatile people and a violent ideology that has a 'holy' book that instructs it's followers to kill Jews and non believers wherever they can is a highly toxic and dangerous mix. As we see the body count in Europe rising almost weekly, maybe even some dumb libertards might start to realise. Though I doubt it.
There is a concerted and organised invasion of European and other countries by these people. They are backed by a whole network of facilitators who teach them, radicalise them, encourage them and often arm them They have often been seemingly normal, productive members of society - even the professions have been involved, doctors, etc.
The organised web of jihadis amongst us (growing in number all the time thanks to dim-witted, cowardly lefties), who seek to slaughter us all, can hardly be compared to the occasional indigenous nut-job who loses it and commits violence on their own.
Meanwhile, as more are allowed into Europe all the time, we have to wait for the next mass casualty attack committed by those unsuited to a civilised, Christian-based democracy.
Sponsored Links
And in the USA, how many people have been killed by citizens with guns in the last ten years, and how many by foreign terrorists?
How about in Norway?
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 728
- Reaction score
- 70
- Country
Probably far less than the amount of people killed by Muslims in the Middle East , in the last few years Johnny Boy. Shall we research and compare?
Racist Woodbine approves keeping brown-skinned foreigners out of US.
By your avoidance technique, I can see you already know that the USA problem is not brown-skinned foreigners, but citizens with guns.
one of the issues in the states is how easy it is to get hold of weapons . nothing will change there.
In a Michael moore doc on the telley he entered a bank in Texas were bye if u opened a bank account u got a free rifle
granted they did not supply ammo ,he got that across the street when he went to get his hair cut in the barbers
In a Michael moore doc on the telley he entered a bank in Texas were bye if u opened a bank account u got a free rifle
granted they did not supply ammo ,he got that across the street when he went to get his hair cut in the barbers
what like the massacre in Srebrenica in July 1995 were some 8000 were executed by Ratco mladic & his hench men ?
Ounce again America had to risk the lives of there sons & daughters to sort out a European issue that Europe could not ??
And not a brown-skinned foreigner among them.
who said there was ???
point being the americans had to step in to assist Europe again
Dare say as most of europe dis like Trump they will sort out there own mess in the future
(not)figures suggest ? (BBC) that some 8000 russians from russia have fought with isis . & probably not a brown skinned person amongst them ? (may be)
but they probably do all have some thing in common.
A certain religion may be
Clearly not.
Trump is on the right lines in theory no 2 ways about it. But in practice banning travel from certain countries will not work.
It does not work in a democracy.(imho)
protest movements , legal challenges etc
Trumps biggest threat to law and order in the states is not from the middle east its probably from mexico ???
It does not work in a democracy.(imho)
protest movements , legal challenges etc
Trumps biggest threat to law and order in the states is not from the middle east its probably from mexico ???
who trump ? may be so ? but he is head of the most powerful nation on earth ? & the UK has for many years been its closest ally ?
When the s**t hits the fan who would I want to rely on Trump & the states or the Europeans
I will go with Trump and the USA
blimey if it was not for the states putin would probably have annexed the Ukraine by now ?
don't suppose he would be to worried about the EU /European response .They would probably spend best part of a year debating about having talks about a talk as to what they would do
and in that time the ****** delegation would probably strip any venue or hotel of carpets , ornaments ,light bulbs & any thing else that was not screwed down (may be)
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
