Anti vaxers will be feeling smug

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Minimise risk of what?
of getting seriously ill from covid

A serious adverse reaction which is already minute
WRONG

the risk of a serious adverse reaction was not minute

The vaccines were pushed on claiming you could not get infected and pass it on, therefore you were entitled to freedom. Stop revising history
I am not revising history

the primary purpose of the vaccines was to stop people getting very ill or dying

they were not rolled out for the purpose of stopping infection

Yes early on scientists did say the vaccine significantly reduced infection and reduced or stopped transmission which was based on the data available at the time for the variants at that time.


Show me where advice in lockdown stated not to take the vaccine if you've already been infected
you are conflating what Fauci said in relation to influenza with advice regarding covid, they are not the same
 
The manufacturers of the vaccines couldn't even back up their claims and here you are pretending to
the manufacturers made claims which were based on the available data for the variant at the time

Do you not understand it was a novel virus so there was no historical data and it was a virus that was mutating so data was changing all the time


It is a shame people like are so invested in your cognitive bias you are incapable of applying critical thinking to the subject. Nevermind its your loss not mine
 
Yes early on scientists did say the vaccine significantly reduced infection and reduced or stopped transmission

Might also have been a white lie, to encourage the mouthbreathers to take up the vaccine.
Because the science / long - winded explanation would have been wasted on them.
Same end result - good - with greater take up (y)
 
you are conflating what Fauci said in relation to influenza with advice regarding covid, they are not the same

You're an expert on knowing Covid and Influenza are different? So presumably when flu jabs are offered, you're advised you don't need to take one if you've already had flu, right? Show me.
 
So presumably when flu jabs are offered, you're advised you don't need to take one if you've already had flu
There are many different strains, current advice is to have a vaccine, even if you've had the flu.
 
the manufacturers made claims which were based on the available data for the variant at the time

Do you not understand it was a novel virus so there was no historical data and it was a virus that was mutating so data was changing all the time


It is a shame people like are so invested in your cognitive bias you are incapable of applying critical thinking to the subject. Nevermind its your loss not mine

You just keep making stuff up. As I said previously and you ignored, anyone with basic knowledge knows they continue to mutate so how would the manufacturers and those plugging the vaccines not already know this? Yet state you only needed two jabs for protection.

It's clearly stated now that getting the vaccines does not stop you getting infected and that is not down to new variants. Stop making your own facts.
 
what is the explanation of a considerable rise in excess deaths throughout the highly vaccinated countries. ? It’s a mystery. The elite boffins at big pharma are silent. MPs are instructed to leave the debate when the topic is discussed those who have been harmed by the vaccine are marginalised
I guess on here , if someone was made ill by the vaccine and made a fuss, they would be characterised as an ‘anti vaxxer’
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top