And if we refuse.

So it was OK for us to get a naming rule which rode roughshod over traditional naming practices in other countries, but the reverse is not OK?
Im not that bothered. What bothers me is the time a needless effort involved.
 
I just wish we'd change our labelling rules so that added orange juice, if used, cannot be counted as fruit content.

These people know how to do it:


View attachment 411923

Sugar, Seville oranges.

That's it.
So you approve of this product. Did the EU tell you to approve of this product or did you figure it out by yourself?
 
I figured it out for myself, because I have room in my head to do that as I haven't stuffed it full of anti-EU bigotry and fantasy nonsense.
No, your head is stuffed with pro EU idolatry.
 
No, your head is stuffed with pro EU idolatry.

If you want to play on the club's course, you have to abide by the club rules.

It's a pity we gave up our right to help decide those rules.
 
They just make this stuff up to keep themselves in jobs, what will they move onto when the marmalade rules are finalised, crisps?
 
I think you'll find labels already get printed every day of the week.
It’s as if bodd and others think their marmalade will become some kind of hostile EU spread, because of clarifications in the labelling.

lol.
 
You can't go wrong if it's got a CE mark.

OIP.Lgicygi1RiPrdzdA2c8Q5wHaDE
 
You can't go wrong if it's got a CE mark.

OIP.Lgicygi1RiPrdzdA2c8Q5wHaDE
There is no official C E Chinese Export mark. Any use of it is intentional misrepresentation.
There is no official Chinese government definition for a distinct "China Export" logo; rather, it is a commonly used, often unauthorized, variation of the European CE mark


Additionally, the CE Conformité Européenne does not denote origin, only to show compliance with European standards.
 
Back
Top