On the Ballot paper it said Remain or leavesilly strawman vinty
nobody has made that claim.
So how is it the EU's intransigence that is at fault?On the Ballot paper it said Remain or leave
The EU has been insisting that the UK accept an unratified "agreement" that has already been rejected by the UK Parliament and I suspect if put to a popular vote it would also be rejected again.So how is it the EU's intransigence that is at fault?
I think you need to have a word with our 'sovereign' Parliament boyo. They are the ones sticking it in the neck of leavers.
Leve means leave surely? How can the EU insist anything?The EU has been insisting
The EU are simply sticking by the rules that the UK agreed to...Even though the EU knows that Mays agreement has no support in Britain they are insisting that it is the only they will accept.
Of course they are, that was the final deal which May agreed.The EU has been insisting that the UK accept an unratified "agreement" that has already been rejected by the UK Parliament and I suspect if put to a popular vote it would also be rejected again.
Even though the EU knows that Mays agreement has no support in Britain they are insisting that it is the only they will accept.
So why aren't we leaving and telling them to shove it?they are insisting that it is the only they will accept.

Yes May agreed the deal and if she was a dictator there wouldn't be any problem, unfortunately her deal required ratification by Parliament, because Parliament rejected her deal it meant there was no deal.Of course they are, that was the final deal which May agreed.
Because Parliament is remainer in sentiment and wants the UK to remain in the EU.So why aren't we leaving and telling them to shove it?
I didn't advocate a second vote on anything I just speculated that if there was a popular vote on Mays deal it would be rejected.So its acceptable to have a second vote on her deal but not a second referendum.