I know what I read in the papers and see on the news. NO.WHITE.GROOMING.GANGS.Since you know even less that's pretty hypocritical.
I know what I read in the papers and see on the news. NO.WHITE.GROOMING.GANGS.Since you know even less that's pretty hypocritical.
Those orphanages are run by the Sisters of Mercy, they must have had a sick smile on their faces when they came up with that name.One of my satellite centres is run by an ex triathlete and boxer. He's no mug and you seriously wouldn’t want to tangle with him but he told me stories of his young years in an orphanage run by Catholic sisters and he said they were absolutely ****ing vicious.
I thought they were the Sisters of Murphy.Those orphanages are run by the Sisters of Mercy, they must have had a sick smile on their faces when they came up with that name.
Hey, another Asian grooming gang apologist. Just like ellal. Hmmm.I suppose you can't really call the Catholic Church, a gang.
Nor can you call various childrens homes gangs.
If Mottie refuses to see the blatantly obvious when it's pointed out to him, there's no hope for him. He'll never get it.
View attachment 195067
Oh dear, old man...Deflection. What 'facts' are you referring to? You just CANT show me any examples of white grooming gangs so you attempt to change the subject. Away with you, you Asian grooming gang apologist.
As do I, if that's enough to qualify us to discuss it then wind your neck in and stop being a dick.I know what I read in the papers and see on the news. NO.WHITE.GROOMING.GANGS.
Go on, off to work. That care home won’t run itself.Oh dear, old man...
Show me where I have been an 'Asian grooming gang apologist'...
Go on, put up or shut up!
You on the other hand don't seem to accept that the cover ups by state organisations and religious bodies over child abuse are akin to gang mentality.
Does that make you an apologist for systematic state and church child abuse?
Or could it be that the different skin colours of the relevant perpetrators are 'clouding your judgement'?
Yawn. You can’t put up so you may as well shut up.As do I, if that's enough to qualify us to discuss it then wind your neck in and stop being a dick.
Is sexual abuse less serious if it is carried out by a lone Paedophile rather than a group of Paedophiles.I suppose you can't really call the Catholic Church, a gang.
Nor can you call various childrens homes gangs.
If Mottie refuses to see the blatantly obvious when it's pointed out to him, there's no hope for him. He'll never get it.
View attachment 195067
I thought they were the Sisters of Murphy.
For anyone who actually wants information on this, have a look at this paper.Is sexual abuse less serious if it is carried out by a lone Paedophile rather than a group of Paedophiles.
I doubt the victims would make a distinction.
Sexual abuse is not motivated by racism. It's motivated by sexual desire.Hey, another Asian grooming gang apologist. Just like ellal. Hmmm.
Mottie refuses to acknowledge the sexual abuse perpetrated by the Catholic Church, childrens homes etc.You on the other hand don't seem to accept that the cover ups by state organisations and religious bodies over child abuse