- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 45,918
- Reaction score
- 3,531
- Country

Was it strictly a breach of the peace?
The guy who yelled stuff at Andrew?
The guy who yelled stuff at Andrew?



Very slippery slopeWhen he got dragged off and hopefully given a good kicking - that may have been a breach of the peace, or at least allowing everyone else to get some.![]()
Yes, he was creating a disturbance that was likely to result in unrest. As was evidenced by those in the crowd that dragged him out before a police office could intervene and stop an assault on him.Was it strictly a breach of the peace?
The guy who yelled stuff at Andrew?

It's been used to good effect to prevent honest souls a-slumber from being roused at a God-awful hour by some pish-'ead 'singing' an off-key tune about gnomes and philosophers - disturbing the peace.There is no offence of Breach of the Peace as such. It's a old term that gives a constable some power. What we do have is the Public Order Act 1986 which has various levels of naughtiness.
Public Order Act 1986
An Act to abolish the common law offences of riot, rout, unlawful assembly and affray and certain statutory offences relating to public order; to create new offences relating to public order; to control public processions and assemblies; to control the stirring up of racial hatred; to provide...www.legislation.gov.uk
I suspect this is a section 5 offence. For Breach of the Peace in general terms R v Howell 1982 is precedent, there needs to be a risk of violence. The argument being that a person who angers the crowd is likely to end up in a fight, thus a constable or any citizen can arrest the person to prevent such an act.
Yeah. I imagine he'll be the recipient of a 'Glasgow Kiss' in the very near futureWhen he got dragged off and hopefully given a good kicking - that may have been a breach of the peace, or at least allowing everyone else to get some.![]()
These people do it to be provocative…..and if you provoke people you might get a kicking.