Agreed.The pubs that allow drunkenness should be hit with the policing charges.
May I add to that John? Lets have them banned from ALL pubs, clubs etc for the period of the sentence or 12 months which ever is the greater? If they're caught in a pub, under the influence etc then the fine, sentence, ban is increased (Custody may be appropriate for repeat offenders). And let Joe's suggestion above also kick in, the pub is also fined. You'd sharp see publicans taking a very active interest in who their customers are and what state they're in. It's an offence now to serve anyone who is intoxicated so they should be prosecuting the landlords now!Bah, the government go on and on about so called "Binge Drinking", then show us the evidence of drunken youths in town centres, causing mayhem etc, fighting and tying up valuable NHS resources in A&E on Friday and Saturday nights. If they want to cut down this binge drinking culture, then apply the laws as they are at the moment re "drunk in a public place"," disturbing the peace", etc but make the fines/sentences a lot stiffer.
Lets say a couple of drunken youths are arrested for fighting/causing a public nuisance/whatever, on a Friday night in some city/town centre, then lock them up till Monday morning, where they are straight in court in front of a magistrate. Give the magistrates the power to levy a hefty fine, plus community service/ curfew. Not the usual £30 fine , make it a fine of £500 minimum. 100 hrs community service and a 3 months curfew from 7.00 pm on a Friday evening until 7.00am on a Monday morning.
The £500 fine would be paid at a rate of approximately what they would normally spend at the weekends getting drunk.
Any further breaches of this sort within 2 yrs would incur double the penalty and so on.
This would go a long way towards cutting down drunken , rowdy behaviour up and down the country. These young un's would soon learn, that they can't go out getting blind drunk and causing trouble, without reaping the consequences of such behaviour.
I think this is the way to go, but,,,,, we all know any government isn't going to go down that route, much simpler to raise taxes on alcohol so the many have to pay for the misdemeanour's of the few.
PS the governments actual definition of binge drinking is anyone who drinks more than 5 units of alcohol per day. So in effect when I go to the darts match on a Tuesday evening and have 3 pints, the government think I'm a "Binge Drinker" on Tuesdays. (tomorrow evening I hope to set a new record, as will 3/4 of the bloody country ) ) Pffffffffffffffftttttttttt
I think the best way is to send them the full costs for hiring the ambulance and renting the A&E room so it's not a burden on the taxpayers, this would be very simple to do and they will soon learnThis would go a long way towards cutting down drunken , rowdy behaviour up and down the country. These young un's would soon learn, that they can't go out getting blind drunk and causing trouble, without reaping the consequences of such behaviour.
The pubs that allow drunkenness should be hit with the policing charges.
He should have been charged with drunkenness and the 'big man' with assault.
Nice one, masona. As an aside, if your involved in a RTA (road traffic accident) the hospital does send you a bill for ambulance and treatment.I think the best way is to send them the full costs for hiring the ambulance and renting the A&E room so it's not a burden on the taxpayers, this would be very simple to do and they will soon learn
The problem is using up more police time and court cases, by paying at the A&E, no need for police etcThose up in court for drunken behaviour usually get fined what amounts to the loose change in their pockets. They should be hit hard with a hefty fine and made to pay the cost of police time on top.
The problem is using up more police time and court cases, by paying at the A&E, no need for police etc