Can an electrician swap my MCBs for RCBOs?

[ahead2955]

Hi all,
When we moved in to our house back in 2018 we found the CU had been upgraded (seemingly anyway, it looked new to me) but when I mentioned it the seller could not provide certification. As part of the sale we got an electrician out to make sure all circuits were safe and they provided a report.

We've not had any issues since but in the interests of safety (and to provide certification should we decide to move) I thought it might be good to get an electrician out to upgrade the CU.

Now its an MK model (pic attached) with 2x 63a RCDs and a load of MCBS. I was thinking it might be more cost efficient for me if an electrician were to swap the MCBs for RCBOs if the existing case will take them. It seems a shame to rip the whole thing out when it’s not even 10 years old.

What are your thoughts. Will the cost difference between a whole new CU versus swapping out MCBs be negligible? Is this even something a sparky would consider? Just trying to get it clear in my head before I request a couple of quotes.

 

[ericmark]

MK is an expensive make, so swapping the MCBs for RCBOs and getting a new bus bar kit, will likely cost more than a new Fusebox consumer unit populated, specially when you look at the price for the surge protection device.

 

[JohnW2]

MK is an expensive make, so swapping the MCBs for RCBOs and getting a new bus bar kit, will likely cost more than a new Fusebox consumer unit populated,

Maybe, but per current TLC prices :

Fusebox: Type A RCBOs ... £13.10+ VAT
MK: Type A RCBOs ... £10.60 + VAT

 

[ahead2955]

Appreciate the advice - another consideration (again I want to be as informed as possible before I accept a quote) I've read about is RCBOs that need to be bidirectional should I opt for a plug in solar panel system when they're made available. Should I state to the sparky that I want them to be bidirectional or will it be assumed/expected that they will be in 2026? If there's little cost difference I'd elect for all to be bidirectional rather than the specific radial I'll be intending on using.

 

[ericmark]

Some makes the bidirectional are cheaper.

 

[pete01]

Whats wrong with it? Couple of C3s maybe

 

[ahead2955]

Whats wrong with it? Couple of C3s maybe

We were never provided with certification so cannot guarantee the previous house owner didn't just DIY it. Also I like the idea of RCBOs should we ever have circuits tripping - and DIY solar requires a bidirectional RCBO apparently so rather than getting a sparky to quote to replace a single MCB, I thought I'd enquire about getting the whole thing replaced so all circuits are safe and certified.

 

[Murdochcat]

It’s a bit of an amateur installation but if it’s not causing issues then leave well alone

 

[JohnW2]

It’s a bit of an amateur installation but if it’s not causing issues then leave well alone

As a matter of interest... other than for the fact that the MCBs are all a bit wonky (which may have arisen subsequent to the initial installation) what is it that tells you that the installation is "a bit amateur"?

 

[pete01]

As a matter of interest... other than for the fact that the MCBs are all a bit wonky (which may have arisen subsequent to the initial installation) what is it that tells you that the installation is "a bit amateur"?

Ive never seen a straight mk mcb....

 

[ericmark]

they provided a report

I thought I'd enquire about getting the whole thing replaced so all circuits are safe and certified.

The installation certificate is nearly the same as the electrical installation condition report, but the installation certificate can only be issued by the person in charge of the work being done.

So safety wise should be no change.

DIY solar requires a bidirectional RCBO apparently

As yet no one has a clue, the details have not been released. The problem with unidirectional RCDs is power is still fed to parts after it trips which can overheat, but with the grid tie solar inverter it is claimed they disconnect the output in milliseconds if the supply fails, so it seems unlikely any unidirectional RCD will be damaged.

I lived for years with just two RCDs, I keep considering an improvement like one of these auto resetting types or one with warning built in, but it's a lot of work for little return, and I never got around to it. This house had no RCDs in main house, so when doing the job went down the all RCBO route, for one thing it makes the consumer unit 4 modules shorter.

So in your case, if I wanted a larger DNO fuse, I note only 63 amps RCDs fitted or add a solar inverter like I have done, so although only a 60 amp DNO fuse I can have 82 amps at the consumer unit due to the 5 kW inverter, so I could not use 63 amps RCDs then while doing the work it may be worth an upgrade of the whole consumer unit, but my son fitted a new consumer unit ready for his EV, and when Octopus came to fit it, they refused to use the new consumer unit anyway. They insisted on using a dedicated one. So idea of future proofing is flawed.

 

[Harry Bloomfield]

We've not had any issues since but in the interests of safety (and to provide certification should we decide to move) I thought it might be good to get an electrician out to upgrade the CU.

In the interests of safety, it will be no safer, if the circuits are already protected by an RCD. The only advantage will be from the perspective of a fault on a circuit developing - a fault would cause a loss of supply to a number of your circuits, so not as convenient.

 

[JohnW2]

In the interests of safety, it will be no safer, if the circuits are already protected by an RCD. The only advantage will be from the perspective of a fault on a circuit developing - a fault would cause a loss of supply to a number of your circuits, so not as convenient.

Indeed, but one (albeit small) 'downside of RCBOs is that they can hinder/frustrate fault-finding to some extent, since if one trips one is given no indication as to whether it has tripped because of over-current or residual current.