Capital Punishment

[King Billy]

That's a very jaundiced way to look at it.

I have said many times before that I very much enjoy discussing language and grammar. It doesn't matter if we don't agree. Apart from your rather aggressive demeanour, this has been a good conversation in my opinion.

I'm sorry if you misinterpret my assertiveness for aggression. But I know when I'm correct despite the yahooing* from the sidelines, because they're not capable of reasoned argument.
I misinterpret your demeaning manner for insults.


*Gulliver's travels.

 

[King Billy]

Not in the slightest, I just report all personal insults as it is against the forum rules and I respect the rules.

Do you report your own as well?

 

[MNW67]

I'm sorry if you misinterpret my assertiveness for aggression. But I know when I'm correct despite the yahooing* from the sidelines, because they're not capable of reasoned argument.
I misinterpret your demeaning manner for insults.


*Gulliver's travels.

I'm always up for a discussion on law or language and grammar. And I approach both with strict objectivity.

 

[King Billy]

Again, it was Himmy.
How many times are you gonna ask?
The answer doesn't change.

What do you mean, again?
I've aksed you several times and this is the first time you've answered.

Can you find this post of Himmy's where he said that all Italians are fascists?
I'm asking because you don't come across as a reliable person, so I'm expecting you to be able to prove that someone said all Italians are fascist because it's obviously not true, and I can't think anyone would be so silly to say that.

 

[King Billy]

I'm always up for a discussion on law or language and grammar. And I approach both with strict objectivity.

But you don't admit when you're wrong?
Or are you still relying on your assumption that everyone knew what he meant, because you and he happened to agree?
Pigeons and chess?
Or is it the tribalism?

 

[transam]

I'm always up for a discussion on law or language and grammar. And I approach both with strict objectivity.

Himmy has alwise gon on about spelin and gramer e used to bang on to mee about the caper Duno wat he was on about arf the time tbh

 

[MNW67]

But you don't admit when you're wrong?
Or are you still relying on your assumption that everyone knew what he meant, because you and he happened to agree?
Pigeons and chess?
Or is it the tribalism?

It's none of those things. That is where you are going wrong. I have fallen out with people from all sides on here because I am not at all tribal and am always objective. I mainly just enjoy a proper discussion. And in this case, it happens that my grammatical interpretation is different to yours.

 

[pete01]

Himmy has alwise gon on about spelin and gramer e used to bang on to mee about the caper Duno wat he was on about arf the time tbh

That nearly made me pass out

Think on...

 

[johnny2007]

What do you mean, again?
I've aksed you several times and this is the first time you've answered.

Can you find this post of Himmy's where he said that all Italians are fascists?
I'm asking because you don't come across as a reliable person, so I'm expecting you to be able to prove that someone said all Italians are fascist because it's obviously not true, and I can't think anyone would be so silly to say that.

Posted many many times and you've seen it.
Every new user you create you start the same rubbish about evidence but I told you 4 or 5 reincarnations ago that I won't play your psycho games anymore.
As said many times before, slavery has been abolished, so as you're so good at finding others' posts, find the offending one yourself.
Won't be difficult, you know exactly where it is.
Oh, and everyone has seen it, that's why everyone has zero respect for you, THE racist bigot in drags.

 

[noseall]

Pre Brexit according to you…

It never ceases to amaze me just how much damage your hero RWR's can inflict on our great country. First Fromage and and your shí££y pointless Brexit and now another darling of the RWR - Trump and his pointless ego driven war.

You must be so proud.

 

[Mottie]

It never ceases to amaze me just how much damage your hero RWR's can inflict on our great country. First Fromage and and your shí££y pointless Brexit and now another darling of the RWR - Trump and his pointless ego driven war.

You must be so proud.

So says the bitter loser….

 

[Mottie]

Don’t care. Tell me, what would your punishment for a child murderer be?

This is where ellal quietly disappears into the ether…..

Well? I see you are back posting but you’ve conveniently missed that question I asked you. Are you still swerving it @ellal ? If you won’t answer this question, don’t expect an answer when you next ask me one. I’m fed up answering your questions when you blatantly ignore, swerve or distract from the ones I ask you.

 

[morqthana]

There’s a world of difference between an off-duty soldier being targeted and slaughtered in the street during peace time to avenge Muslims over past events and one killed during an ongoing conflict. Nosey thinks there’s no difference where, when, how and why someone is killed if they are a soldier and mentioned the IRA. Perhaps you should be asking him why he thinks one is no less heinous than the other unless you feel the same way.

Perhaps you should produce the evidence, an intelligent and reasoned analysis of which justifies the claim that noseall is an IRA apologist.

From the two scenarios in this post, if he thinks one is no less heinous than the other, he thinks they are just as heinous as each other, i.e what the IRA did was just as bad as what the killers of Lee Rigby did or what the killers did was no worse than what the IRA did.

Either way of expressing it is hardly an apologist post for the IRA.

 

[morqthana]

My point was, off duty soldiers not involved in any conflict were not targeted and slaughtered in the streets by religious fanatics in the good old days.

The IRA were not "religious fanatics".

 

[Mottie]

Perhaps you should produce the evidence, an intelligent and reasoned analysis of which justifies the claim that noseall is an IRA apologist.

From the two scenarios in this post, if he thinks one is no less heinous than the other, he thinks they are just as heinous as each other, i.e what the IRA did was just as bad as what the killers of Lee Rigby did or what the killers did was no worse than what the IRA did.

Either way of expressing it is hardly an apologist post for the IRA.

Here’s my reasoned and intelligent analysis of what you think of my posts.

I. Don't. Care.

That do ya? It’ll have to because that’s all you’re getting.