Change UK Threatens Brexit Party, Farage a Worldwide Joke

[Ihavenojob]

Poor old SammyInnit...

Resorts to name calling when shown up...Yet again!

But hey, you carry on changing the question when you don't get the answer you want...
(kind of like what the whole brexshit process you appear to not like is doing right now )

Where is he name calling?

 

[Notch7]

Resorts to name calling when shown up...Yet again!

I don't see any name calling

Perhaps you are a bit sensitive......bit of a snowflake

 

[ellal]

And funny how we only get forecasts of gloom and doom from the remoaners.

Ah, no clue yet again...

Remainers are eagerly waiting for quitters to tell us how much better it will be outside the EU...

And how and when are surely such simple questions to respond to, aren't they?

After all, quitters apparently knew exactly what they were voting for so they should have the answers

 

[ellal]

I don't see any name calling

Perhaps you are a bit sensitive......bit of a snowflake

I don't give a flying fig...

Just pointing out that when a member of the 'confusion' loses the plot, then 'Lal' slips in to a pointless reply...

You're also kind of partial to act the same way...

But then you are also more than a tad 'confused' with your weak arguments...
(Next we'll be getting your threats over locking threads )

 

[SammyInnit]

Poor old SammyInnit...

Resorts to name calling when shown up...Yet again!

That exactly what you did in that post Lal, you presumed I didn't understand your response but you didn't even answer the right question with it.

You talked about a change in referendum law to make it binding so that the questions wouldn't be asked again.

That's not answering what I was asking.

Let's just for a moment presume everyone knows this, we'll be worse off, it'll damage the economy.

It goes back to public vote and the result is the same (leave) and let's for a moment consider (should the second vote allow) that the majority vote to leave with no deal.

To clarify, we know, we accept, by majority we vote for it anyway.


Then what?

Poor old Lal doesn't even know what the question was to answer.

The question is in regard to a second referendum, not going to referendum for the first time.

If that were the case your answer doesn't change the outcome regardless of if we did or didn't know the damage that could be done to the economy because as I said, the argument used time and time again is 'we didn't know what we were voting for, no one voted to be poorer' - if it were in law we couldn't have that second vote for as you say, a long time afterwards, there's no point in discussing it.

 

[Notch7]

'Lal'

its a shortened version of your name.....hardly name calling old bean, perhaps you were just lashing out as you were losing the argument.

now keep it polite, we dont want any threads being locked

 

[JP_]

You don't even understand what you've quoted is saying.

So why does it say "which assumes a bilateral trade agreement with the EU would have been negotiated"?

Was a bilateral trade agreement with the EU negotiated before the referendum?

Nothing has changed yet, businesses are still trading as normal, because we're still in the EU. To say leaving the EU will definitely be OK because it is already OK doesn't make any sense at all.

WE HAVE NOT LEFT YET

Why is that so hard to understand?

And funny how we only get forecasts of gloom and doom from the remoaners.

Why is either of these unexpected? If remainers said "Oh, I am sure leaving will be OK, but I just like being in the EU" then they would be ridiculed, and likewise if Brexiters said "it's going to be a total disaster, we might be making a huge mistake" people would question their sanity too.

We really don't know how exactly it will pan out. But, it doesn't look like it will really be very good, if you believe about 98% of the experts.

 

[Mottie]

Were they the same experts who predicted the collapse of society as we know it if the vote to leave won?

 

[JohnD]

I haven't met any experts who predicted that. What were their names, and where did you see these predictions?

 

[SammyInnit]

Why is that so hard to understand?

You tell me, it is you who has failed to understand.

Before the referendum, the then-Chancellor George Osborne said that “across Britain as many as 820,000 jobs could be lost.” He was quoting Treasury analysis which said that the number of unemployed people would increase by that number in the two years following a vote to leave.

That’s not the same as the number of jobs as one person can have more than one job.

The Treasury analysis estimated that under different scenarios following a vote to leave between 520,000 (in a “shock scenario”) and 820,000 (in a “severe shock scenario”) more people would be unemployed by June 2018.

https://assets.publishing.service.g...omic_impact_of_leaving_the_eu_web.pdf#page=56

https://fullfact.org/economy/whats-happened-employment-vote-leave-eu/


Just so there is no more confusion in your mind, here is Osbourne on video reiterating what I've already told you.

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Thought John D would have at least said thank you for showing him what he asked for

 

[Notch7]

Not really related to unemployment following the referendum, I actually wonder if employment is as low as we think, or is it the way its recorded.

There are an awful lot of people in the gig economy, they are classed as employed, but may not be getting enough hours per week.

In terms of economic impact of Brexit, there are almost forecasts that pdedict an economic upturn, so the discussion the level of damage.

Its probably somewhere between what leavers and remainers believe.

What leavers dont factor in, is the amount of trade that will get snatched away during negotiations, the Europeans would love to get hold as much financial services as they can.

 

[noseall]

The Irish are really against any brexit whatsoever. Had a fella ranting at me last night in a bar in Portugal.

 

[Brigadier]

The Irish are really against any brexit whatsoever. Had a fella ranting at me last night in a bar in Portugal.

 

[JohnD]

The Irish are really against any brexit whatsoever. Had a fella ranting at me last night in a bar in Portugal.

Luckily for them, they have the USA on their side, so, like Israel, they can never lose.



https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...elfast-agreement-weakened-by-brexit-1.3861459

"Pelosi warns no US-UK trade deal if Belfast Agreement weakened by Brexit
US House of Representatives speaker in London ahead of Ireland trip"