- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,427
- Reaction score
- 2,132
- Country
Cheap at the price...
- Thread starter ellal
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,427
- Reaction score
- 2,132
- Country
E
EddieM
Current GPS uses 24, but you only need 9 (3 x 3)
Well ok, but i don't see the point if we've already invested in a very accurate GPS alternative.. seems a waste of money.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,427
- Reaction score
- 2,132
- Country
GPS is fine until the person who owns it, encrypts it so only they can use it. This was a project to create an EU wide alternative that the EU controlled.
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
Rice-Pudd thinks a no-deal is great.
No-deal means, among other things, no agreement to use the GPS. Such an agreement would be a deal, or part of one.
An agreement to fly planes over and between countries would be a deal, or part of one.
An agreement of terms to import and export car parts, or live plants, or food, would be a deal, or part of one.
If we resign with no deal, the EU "takes back control" of lots of things. Who can possibly complain about them "taking back control?"
Only an idiot would want a no-deal Brexit
What is Rice-Pudd?
No-deal means, among other things, no agreement to use the GPS. Such an agreement would be a deal, or part of one.
An agreement to fly planes over and between countries would be a deal, or part of one.
An agreement of terms to import and export car parts, or live plants, or food, would be a deal, or part of one.
If we resign with no deal, the EU "takes back control" of lots of things. Who can possibly complain about them "taking back control?"
Only an idiot would want a no-deal Brexit
What is Rice-Pudd?
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 14,427
- Reaction score
- 2,132
- Country
Its odd that the EU considers post Brexit Britain a higher security risk than China, who are participating in the project. Also odd that they think commercial users will pay for it when they already have GPS. Its starting to look very much like a re-launch of betamax.
A no deal also means no £39B divorce bill and no future payments.
A no deal wont happen. End of. Its all propaganda, which seems to getting remainers into a right tizzy.
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
It is so odd that the UK wants desperately to remain part of it, and has been happy to part finance it, and would be happy to continue to part finance it.
Oddly, China will pay for commercial use of it. UK could have the same degree of access as China, as a third party nation, which oddly, you seem to think that they would be denied such access.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...s-deal-give-uk-guaranteed-access-after-brexit
But UK want greater access than any other third party nation. Why should they be allowed greater access?
Did they not consider, prior to Article 50, that they would be considered a third party nation after Brexit?
Cake and eat it?
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,726
- Reaction score
- 64
- Country
You keep making this ludicrous claim when I have repeatedly proved that your claim is nonsense.
UK government legal experts consider that the divorce payment must be paid whatever the deal/no deal outcome.
And a refusal to stick to commitments means a lower credit rating/higher debt interest payments/even worse trading deals.
Thus costing far more in the long run...
Not to mention finally gaining the reputation of being a 'banana republic' nation!
(we are already a 'laughing stock', so not that big a step)
That's Brexitland for you!
Ha ha ha
Its a fact. The UK currently have no legal requirement to pay any divorce bill.
Your ludicrous allegation and assertion is utter nonsense
Another anti UK post from Ellal and one he cant back up.
The poor chap must be utterly miserable living in a country he hates.
- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
