Softus said:
Meaning that the table has a value to it - it can be sold to make money.
The song only has value if it's listened to - if no one listens to it then it's worthless.
Oh that's alright then.
Cliff Richard will lose royalties
- Thread starter gcol
- Start date
Meaning that the table has a value to it - it can be sold to make money.
The song only has value if it's listened to - if no one listens to it then it's worthless.
Oh that's alright then.
Sponsored Links
masona said:
Do you really think he misses the money he gives away? The amount he gives would be like us donating loose change
I have an idea
. Why not extend the time limit but all royalties after 50 years have to go directly into the NHS After all, CR is hardly likely to miss it but the NHS could certainly make use of them There, problem solved
This is a marvellous idea - otherwise the people who profit the most will be the record companies.Brightness said:Why not extend the time limit but all royalties after 50 years have to go directly into the NHS
There, problem solved
Sponsored Links
Have to agree, the next problem would be, they will invest their money off-shore instead, unless that's happening. I though Labour was going to soak the rich?
The rich people are more richer under this government than ever
The rich people are more richer under this government than ever
Softus said:
If tables had no value there would be no tables.
Music has value if people enjoy it, even if it is just a few lines on a sheet in your hand or a few notes in someones head.
Laws are not always right.
Softus said:gcol said:
Utter tosh - I've completely lost where you're coming from.gcol said:
I happen to think that it is alright. If you don't, then why don't you write to your MP?gcol said:Oh that's alright then.
I can see why Joe-90 loses his patience with you Softus. You're probably a real nice guy, but you do come across as a bad tempered chap.
You started the thing with the table - you obviously didn't understand the thread if you start on about tables, so how can you possibly understand my response to your inane questions?
Softus
How can you call CR greedy and why call him a to##er, ?
Brightness it may be a good idea, but if the government had of got there act together regarding the NHS in the first place we wouldn't be talking of ways to help fund it.
PS i'm sure if the ball was on the other foot 99.99% of us would act the same as him.
rant over.
How can you call CR greedy
and why call him a to##er, ?Brightness it may be a good idea, but if the government had of got there act together regarding the NHS in the first place we wouldn't be talking of ways to help fund it.
PS i'm sure if the ball was on the other foot 99.99% of us would act the same as him.
rant over.
hermes said:
So do you consider it right to just ignore the ones YOU consider to be "not right"? We are only talking of someone who will stop receiving payment for something he did 50 years ago. I don't get paid for something I did 50 days ago.
markie said:Softus
How can you call CR greedy
All men masturbate, that's why. (so do most women, but we don't talk about that, Queen Victoria would not be amused).
Not all of us are that greedy.
oilman said:
Stop trying to put words into my mouth. I don't really care either way what happens to Cliff's royalties.
oilman said:hermes said:
So do you consider it right to just ignore the ones YOU consider to be "not right"? We are only talking of someone who will stop receiving payment for something he did 50 years ago. I don't get paid for something I did 50 days ago.
markie said:Softus
How can you call CR greedy
All men masturbate, that's why. (so do most women, but we don't talk about that, Queen Victoria would not be amused).
Not all of us are that greedy.
IMHO no one can say 100% what they would do, we are'nt celebs with millions in the bank.
Sponsored Links
