You're spreading fake news again. It's what you do best.
The first cases were Irish and Scottish manufacturers, then French, Luxembourg, Cypriot and Dutch firms were involved.
In the incident that you are thinking of, the meat left Romania correctly labelled as horse meat. It was a subsequent process that mixed the horse meat with beef and incorrectly labelled it as beef.
French Consumer Affairs Minister
Benoît Hamon said the meat had left Romania clearly and correctly labelled as horse and that it was afterwards that it was relabelled as beef by Spanghero
a Cypriot trader... had bought it from Dutch food supplier Draap (the Dutch word for horse,
Paard spelled backwards), owned by Jan Fasen, who was previously convicted for horse meat fraud in 2007.
[37] Draap, in turn, bought it from two Romanian slaughterhouses.
[37] Poujol then supplied a factory in Luxembourg, owned by Comigel, which then supplied Findus and the British supermarkets. The Romanian government has stated that there are no contracts between the Romanian abattoirs and any French, Cypriot or Dutch meat processors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_horse_meat_scandal
Clearly the Romanians were perfectly legal in their labeling and trading. It was subsequent traders that committed the crimes. But that doesn't suit your agenda.
Understanding the truth never was your strong point. You prefer to twist the story to suit your own narrative, even when your story is palpably untrue.
The fact that UK and Irish traders were the first culprits is 'swept under the carpet' by you. It is what you do best. Divert attention away from the worst offenders by drawing attention to other incidents.
As I have just demonstrated, your understanding of events is evidently coloured by your desire to twist the truth into your own xenophobic perception.
Therefore, your stereotyping of Romanians is undoubtedly your twisted version. But it is what you do best with your raging xenophobia.