Corbyn heckler suspended

Sponsored Links
And you think you are telling any of us something we don’t know?
Unless any of us in the U.K. have been ignoring the news and politics of last few decades, then we all know what has been going on, especially since the GFA.

Boris Johnson was not unique in having to meet all sorts of individuals, including very shady people. It is part of the job in politics to meet or be in the same event as other people of a different political or moral thinking unfortunately.
Westminster has to facilitate offices to Sinn Fein and in NI it is normal for opposing sides to have to work together in councils and other events.

Trump meeting Gerry Adams years ago, - who cares? Trump would meet anyone. Most Americans wouldn’t know the truth anyhow.
Although I would ask where the American compromise or peace talks are with terrorists who attack or kill Americans? :)

Ex IRA woman becoming a Tory councillor? - fine if she knows she was wrong in the past. We all know there are plenty like her.

Prince Charles or the Queen or Peter Robinson alongside the now late Martin McGuinness? That’s British politics and diplomacy for you. Can’t say anything good about it though.

So we go back to Jeremy Corbyn or creepy John McDonnell,
They are not only included in photos together with certain terrorists, and terrorist groups, they vigorously supported them.
If that part bursts anybody’s bubble, I say wise up, get educated, do look into what Jeremy did openly support until he had to hide it.

Slightly getting off subject, - but why is it that many of the people who would claim Corbyn was never guilty of being a terrorist supporter, will judge and convict Prince Andrew on being a liar and involved with young women ?
After all, Prince Andrew denied the sex allegations and remembering the young woman, so all we have is photos and her word.
Corbyn denies his alleged links, despite all the paperwork, photos, videos, including of his speeches.
But Corbyn didn’t do it, Prince Andrew did? o_O :D

So what you are saying is:

Johnson has met shady people .....thats ok because he is on your team
Corbyn has met shady people.......thats not ok because he is not on your team.

It is not an awfully convincing argument, it is Old Bean.
Do try harder :ROFLMAO:
 
So what you are saying is:

Johnson has met shady people .....thats ok because he is on your team
Corbyn has met shady people.......thats not ok because he is not on your team.

It is not an awfully convincing argument, it is Old Bean.
Do try harder :ROFLMAO:

Pretty much how it is

Governments have to talk and meet up with the world's scum bags that's how it works
Gaddaffi
Saddam
Amin
Puttin
That bloke in North Korea

Corbyn was a back bencher who did it Voluntarily he had no mandate

Politics is a dirty business in particular foreign policy
 
So what you are saying is:

Johnson has met shady people .....thats ok because he is on your team
Corbyn has met shady people.......thats not ok because he is not on your team.

It is not an awfully convincing argument, it is Old Bean.
Do try harder :ROFLMAO:

That is not what I said.
If Corbyn had to meet shady people because it was part of his job to go to some function or visit some area, then that wouldn’t be anything to blame Corbyn for.

Actively supporting certain terrorists groups is different and the photos of Corbyn with terrorists representatives are more significant.

Personally, I wouldn’t want to be seen with unrepentant terrorist supporters of any background, but unfortunately I must admit our politicians don’t all share that belief
 
Sponsored Links
What ball cocks

Corbyn was a back bencher who Voluntarily met up with all those terrorists or X terrorists

You cannot see the difference between that and those in government having to meet up with such people :LOL:

Jeez us wept :LOL:

Corbyns meetings paved the way for the future peace agreement. Corbyn actually made it happen.

The others just wanted photo ops
 
Corbyns meetings paved the way for the future peace agreement. Corbyn actually made it happen.

The others just wanted photo ops

If that was true then why did Corbyn not support and engage with terrorists from the opposing side?
The “peace agreement” had nothing to do with Corbyn’s support for decades of terrorists.
Truth was British government was working together with the Irish government for several years for a sort of appeasement to create an agreement.
IRA murdered right up to the last days.
Corbyn didn’t utter a word of condemnation
 
Where is this 'actively supporting' -how?

Was Corbyn supplying the IRA with guns?

Actively supporting doesn’t necessarily involve supplying guns.
There really is no explanation for Corbyn’s views in my opinion.
He is a waste of time.
 
There really is no explanation for Corbyn’s views in my opinion

First you said Corbyn was 'actively supporting terrorist groups'....
Now you have backtracked and are saying Corbyn has 'views'....

But since you cant provide any evidence, we will have to assume both of these statements are false.
 
First you said Corbyn was 'actively supporting terrorist groups'....
Now you have backtracked and are saying Corbyn has 'views'....

But since you cant provide any evidence, we will have to assume both of these statements are false.

Depends what u mean by actively?

Did not corbyn receive an award from Hamas :LOL:???
 
Yeah but Corbyn doesnt support them, they are just his friends

OK ;)

2 enemies sat down and cooperated in government for years

Martin mac Gunness and Rev Ian Paisley
They were referred to as the chuckle brothers

The reason was because the people of Ireland willed it through democracy

Corbyn has never had any such mandate he has always been a loose cannon in the Labour Party
Anti Nato and anti EU

The buffoon has never supported British troops not in Kosovo or the Falklands

Blokes a buffoon
 
The buffon even doubted that salsbury murder caper ;)

Praised that despot castro who bumped off thousands ;)

All as a back bencher
 
Where is this 'actively supporting' -how?

Through his rhetoric and deeds.
He met with ira leaders many times to show his solidarity and support for the armed struggle.
Nasty piece of work. Quite incredible that he leads a major UK political party.

He has never met with victims of the ira to express any remorse or condemn the men of terror.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top