"could have had a baby in the time it took the Prime Minister to apologise"

We have a system were the leader of the government can break the law, and the only person who can fire him is a 96 year old lady with health problems, who never gets involved with politics.

Something is not right.
 
We have a system were the leader of the government can break the law, and the only person who can fire him is a 96 year old lady with health problems, who never gets involved with politics.

Something is not right.

:rolleyes::confused:

loose a vote of no confidence and he would have to go
:idea:
 
As to the title of the thread

one could have had 8 babies in the time it took the EU to not agree a trade deal with the USA

but to agree a not to agree deal

8 babies and millions of euros on wasted expenditure to agree not to agree :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

and that does not include the costs of any pilfering that went on during said meetings :ROFLMAO:
 
Yeah, but that requires his own party to turn on him.

well yes a significant number

and that could well happen

in particular if there is a fair chance of them loosing there seats
 
are you suggesting that the EU is to blame for Johnson breaking the rules he himself introduced and ordered the rest of us to follow?

well you brought the baby caper into the conversation ref this party gate time scale

plus I really don’t care if Johnson resigns or not

it’s not going to result in a general election

plus the buffoon may well be an asset to Starmer vote wise in 2 years time ??? But hey ho

Johnson stabbed may in the back
What go’s around comes around
 
As to the title of the thread

one could have had 8 babies in the time it took the EU to not agree a trade deal with the USA

but to agree a not to agree deal

8 babies and millions of euros on wasted expenditure to agree not to agree :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

and that does not include the costs of any pilfering that went on during said meetings :ROFLMAO:


A worthless deal can be done in no time at all.

UK has negotiated a few utterly worthless deals
 
Had he challenged it in court, I think he’d have won, of course the risk of losing results in a proper conviction.

Is it in time?
Was the evidence collected lawfully?
Does the legislation allow for a FPN without challenge?

huge holes.
 
you brought the EU into the "johnson lying and partying" caper

it has nothing to do with them.

Yes brought it as evidence of time scale and how many babies one could have had in said time scale

mind you there might be some EU conspiracy involvement on this party gate caper :idea::sneaky::sneaky:

or Russians ???
 
Back
Top