what I wrote is indeed correct, it is not hot air
thank fuk for brexit creating all these problems.
what I wrote is indeed correct, it is not hot air
thank fuk for brexit creating all these problems.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,587
- Reaction score
- 549
- Country
This is more absurd logic. If you don't want a deal and don't want to trade with the EU, then why not just leave.
If you want to play it out in the hope you can get a better deal - how much uneccessary pain are you willing to endure? Hit to GDP, economy, jobs? Can you tell me how much we should endure in the hope of getting a deal?
This deal only covers goods.
what you are saying is "I dont want to think about the problems Ive caused"
What I’m saying is I’m happy for the U.K. to sell goods to Europe. I'm happy for the EU to sell goods to the U.K. I just don’t want all the other **** that goes with it.
Mottie says he is pleased with all the brexit red tape and all the *** that goes with it
hey Mottie how did "all the other *** that goes with it" actually affect you in any way whatsoever?
I have yet to hear a single brexiteer tell me how the EU directly affected them negatively...
They won't say...
Why is that I wonder?
There could be an explosion of smuggling post Brexit.
It could be more than illegals who cross the channel in small boats.
Brandy from France just like the olden days, Whisky going in the other direction, if people want stuff they will always get it no matter what politicians do.
It could be more than illegals who cross the channel in small boats.
Brandy from France just like the olden days, Whisky going in the other direction, if people want stuff they will always get it no matter what politicians do.
Europeans took a fair chunk of our housing stock, filled our schools and hospitals and bled our benefits system.
I've told this story before, so you're not being accurate with this statement.I have yet to hear a single brexiteer tell me how the EU directly affected them negatively...
They won't say...
Why is that I wonder?
The EU ruled that overtime should be considered when calculating holiday pay. They made the ruling retrospective which allowed employees to claim for historic holiday pay.
Whether you agree with overtime being included in holiday pay, it wasn't the contractual arrangement that most companies had in the UK and nor was it custom and practice. Yet the ruling applied.
The UK government were able to limit the retrospective claims to 2 years. Still cost me personally around £10k for the two years retrospective claim.
That specific enough for you?
Last edited:
filled our schools and hospitals with much needed workers you mean
and paid more in taxes and NI than they cost (which is not the same as our ageing indiginous population)
I'm glad you mention the very poor performance of the UK in building homes. I wonder where the government in charge resides?
Well bless my soul, who could have seen that coming?
"Tories fail to build any of 200,000 starter homes promised in 2015, says watchdog
National Audit Office says no starter homes have been built despite election pledge
Successive Conservative governments have failed to deliver a single new “starter home” despite promising to build 200,000 by 2020, Whitehall’s spending watchdog has found.
The party’s 2015 manifesto committed to building the homes across England to be sold exclusively to first-time buyers under the age of 40, to help young people take their first step on the property ladder.
The National Audit Office (NAO) said that, to date, no such homes have been built because the government has not budgeted for them or activated all of the necessary legislation."
https://www.theguardian.com/society...n-starter-homes-in-2015-manifesto-report-says
must have been a great disappointment to Tory voters to be let down like that.
Luckily none of them have grandchildren who hope one day to have a home of their own. Like Mottie, they don't care.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/election-2019-50507342
"Tories fail to build any of 200,000 starter homes promised in 2015, says watchdog
National Audit Office says no starter homes have been built despite election pledge
Successive Conservative governments have failed to deliver a single new “starter home” despite promising to build 200,000 by 2020, Whitehall’s spending watchdog has found.
The party’s 2015 manifesto committed to building the homes across England to be sold exclusively to first-time buyers under the age of 40, to help young people take their first step on the property ladder.
The National Audit Office (NAO) said that, to date, no such homes have been built because the government has not budgeted for them or activated all of the necessary legislation."
https://www.theguardian.com/society...n-starter-homes-in-2015-manifesto-report-says
must have been a great disappointment to Tory voters to be let down like that.
Luckily none of them have grandchildren who hope one day to have a home of their own. Like Mottie, they don't care.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/election-2019-50507342
no they didnt
stop repeating the same misinformation
https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac....s/the-fiscal-impact-of-immigration-in-the-uk/
Government data shows that EEA nationals pay more in income taxes and national insurance contributions than they receive in tax credits and child benefit
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,587
- Reaction score
- 549
- Country
A fair chunk? You have a number on that?
Any sources for this?
So they took our jobs and also our benefits.
Similar threads
