Does any of this seem familiar?

[handyjack]

So funny I had to share.

 

[DRM]

He mentions this.

There are a lot more like this!

 

[Himaginn]

Got hat right. The three stooges never let the truth get in the way of their weak, predictable arguments. Then they vanish. Typical left-wing sell out merchants.

Yep, some of us have lives to live, while your life revolves around spouting hatred, lies and incitement to violence.
Racism is not an aberration of feelings alone, it engenders a hatred that seeks to manifest itself in actions.

 

[Himaginn]

So, John Doh! and Himmy - from the quote used above to 'prove' that I called JD a paedophile - perhaps you can explain why it calls you nothing of the sort?
Please state, without digression, chicanery or diversion EXACTLY where the quote explicitly calls you a paedophile, or accuses you of paedophilia.

On two separate occasions, in two different threads, without any relevant discussion concerned, you accuse John of defending peadophilia.
I've said on many occasions that anyone defending racism, must by assumption and association be considered a racist also.
Thus, your accusation of defending peadophilia, must by assumption and association, be considered a direct and explicit accusation of peadolphilia.
Certainly, the fist quote, below, makes a direct intimation that John is 'revolting' for being associated with peadophilia. The two sentences are not separated in any way, therefore the two must be considered in a conjoined view. You go no to state in your second quote, that John, not only dismisses peadophilia but defends it. John, like me and noseall do not defend, and never have defended any religion. We all take a stance against blatant racism, especially of the sort embraced by you.

No more revolting than someone who is from a class of people who are happy to dismiss foreign paedophiles in northern cities, ...You are truly a 'revolting', bedwetting, hypocritical. cowardly, duplicitous, appeasing, treacherous, pathetic, sensationalist worm-tongue, who would sell your country down the river for whatever trendy bandwagon cause the capitalist run left-wing tells you to. Silly LITTLE 'man'.

Liberal bedwetter, yes. Supporter and defender of religions predisposed to paedophilia, definitely.

So now that we've established that you are truly a 'revolting', bedwetting, hypocritical. cowardly, duplicitous, appeasing, treacherous, pathetic, sensationalist worm-tongue, do you think an apology is in order?

 

[EFLImpudence]

I can see there is plenty to go at, posted from the RWR haters.

Ah. Is that the RWR haters (RWRs) or the RWR haters (yourself) or vice versa?
Is being a RWR hater a good thing or a bad thing?

Do you mean RWR-ists or anti-RWR-ists?
Or is an RWR-ist one who likes them or hates them?

You must be clearer in future or Himmy won't know what you mean, though - even then ...

 

[Himaginn]

Ah. Is that the RWR haters (RWRs) or the RWR haters (yourself) or vice versa?
Is being a RWR hater a good thing or a bad thing?

Do you mean RWR-ists or anti-RWR-ists?
Or is an RWR-ist one who likes them or hates them?

You must be clearer in future or Himmy won't know what you mean, though - even then ...

Are you using that word generator again? I've told you before that it spews out gobbledygook.

 

[sooey]

Are you using that word generator again? I've told you before that it spews out gobbledygook.

Obviously speaking from experience, why not try thinking for yourself?

 

[Himaginn]

Obviously speaking from experience, why not try thinking for yourself?

That is so rich, coming from the most gullible poster who suffers so badly from selective processing of information that he refuses to consider counter arguments in case it bursts his bigoted perception.

 

[sooey]

Counter arguments??? Since when have slurs and accusations been counter arguments?
And since when has saying the "UN", "government sources" and most laughably of all, "scientific organisations" disagree with you so you must be wrong been a counter argument?
"scientific organisations" from you. You know as much about science as you do about making friends and influencing people on forums you fool.

 

[Himaginn]

Counter arguments??? Since when have slurs and accusations been counter arguments?
And since when has saying the "UN", "government sources" and most laughably of all, "scientific organisations" disagree with you so you must be wrong been a counter argument?
"scientific organisations" from you. You know as much about science as you do about making friends and influencing people on forums you fool.

So, in your opinion, UN, government organisations and scientific bodies count for nought? Your opinion is paramount?
Is that the gist of your argument?

 

[sooey]

So, in your opinion, UN, government organisations and scientific bodies count for nought? Your opinion is paramount?
Is that the gist of your argument?

That depends entirely upon what subject the opinion is about. I wouldn't take much notice of the UN, government organisations or scientific bodies opinions on many things that I could think of.

 

[noseall]

I wouldn't take much notice of the UN, government organisations or scientific bodies opinions on many things that I could think of.

Who do you rely upon for your information?

 

[sooey]

The geezer in our local shop where I go for me sarnie every morning knows his stuff.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Don't you know any taxi drivers?

 

[noseall]

The geezer in our local shop where I go for me sarnie every morning knows his stuff.

Gotcha.
You do admit then that all the (biased) youtube stuff is unreliable?