Our house was built 21 years ago and 16 years ago we had a loft extension. The lighting circuit for this appears to have been extended from the upstairs light circuit and the same for the loft sockets.
The consumer unit has a 32amp mcb for the upstairs sockets, which includes the loft sockets and a 6amp mcb for the upstairs lights, which includes the loft lights.
Now for the confusing bit! It was my understanding that the upstairs sockets were on a ring circuit, hence the 32amp mcb. I don't know this for sure, but if it was a radial circuit I would expect a lower rated mcb to have been used eg. 20amp?
I'm considering adding a spur to one of the loft sockets, but wanted to understand how they have been wired up, so I removed the front of each socket. There are 5 sockets in total and to my surprise 4 of them had two cables connected, but one of them only had one cable. Following the cable, where I can (down the eaves crawl space) it runs from one socket to the next and terminates at the socket with only one cable. Isn't this a radial circuit?
I can't determine where the loft socket cable originates, so I'm guessing it has been spurred off the original upstairs ring circuit.
If this is the case, isn't this essentially a spur with 5 sockets? Would this have been acceptable 16 years ago?
5 years ago, as part of a kitchen extension, due to a number of new appliances, the original consumer unit was replaced with a new consumer unit allowing more mcb protected circuits. As part of this work, the house electrics were tested. Shouldn't the "spur" into the loft have raised issues?
What I've found is concerning me enough to not want to add a spur to a loft socket as I don't want to potentially overload the "spur" cable.
Have I got this wrong? Should I be concerned?
The consumer unit has a 32amp mcb for the upstairs sockets, which includes the loft sockets and a 6amp mcb for the upstairs lights, which includes the loft lights.
Now for the confusing bit! It was my understanding that the upstairs sockets were on a ring circuit, hence the 32amp mcb. I don't know this for sure, but if it was a radial circuit I would expect a lower rated mcb to have been used eg. 20amp?
I'm considering adding a spur to one of the loft sockets, but wanted to understand how they have been wired up, so I removed the front of each socket. There are 5 sockets in total and to my surprise 4 of them had two cables connected, but one of them only had one cable. Following the cable, where I can (down the eaves crawl space) it runs from one socket to the next and terminates at the socket with only one cable. Isn't this a radial circuit?
I can't determine where the loft socket cable originates, so I'm guessing it has been spurred off the original upstairs ring circuit.
If this is the case, isn't this essentially a spur with 5 sockets? Would this have been acceptable 16 years ago?
5 years ago, as part of a kitchen extension, due to a number of new appliances, the original consumer unit was replaced with a new consumer unit allowing more mcb protected circuits. As part of this work, the house electrics were tested. Shouldn't the "spur" into the loft have raised issues?
What I've found is concerning me enough to not want to add a spur to a loft socket as I don't want to potentially overload the "spur" cable.
Have I got this wrong? Should I be concerned?