Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

An analogy of the real reason behind most people's refusal to accept that sex is not binary:
1775099735335.png


The 1837 Act to create the requirement of sex being registered, as only either male or female, for all newborn babies was created by the C of E clergy representatives in the House of Lords, which was overwhelmingly Anglican, and dominated by C of E Bishops and Archbishops. Some RCs were allowed to sit, but few did.
The oath to the Christian doctrine prevented other religions from being represented.
The House of Lords in 1837 was largely a bastion of the established church during a time of significant pressure for reform and increased secularization.

And we now know that the C of E is old-fashioned and out of touch with reality, just as it was nearly 200 years ago.
The Church of England (C of E) is widely perceived to be in a profound state of decline, characterized by falling attendance, an aging demographic, and a disconnect from modern British culture. While some urban areas see growth, many reports highlight a shrinking, "out-of-touch" institution grappling with cultural irrelevance and internal structural crises.

Thus the designation of only two sexes is a socially constructed model based on C of E bishops and archbishops religious belief, nearly 200 years ago.
It was old-fashioned, outdated and out of touch with reality then, it's even more so today, given the advances in Medical Science over the last 200 years.
The C of E is so out of touch with todays society, it still refuses to allow same-sex marriages and still refuses to consider homosexuality as acceptable.
38% of UK's population have no religion, that's about 20,000,000 people, and rapidly rising. Yet they are still 'governed' by an outdated religious doctrine. https://commonslibrary.parliament.u...n, 46% of,for constituencies in Great Britain.
Of course, some believe its doctrine. and insist it should govern non-believers.
 
Last edited:
Do you never tell the truth?
I'm still waiting for this supposed evidence you said you would present to prove my assertion false.
All I've had so far is snippets of various posts of mine cobbled together by you in an effort to discredit me, and an immense amount of waffle.
 
Back
Top