Ginger men who now identifies as a woman.

Strange that the police forces have no record of such instances,

And now you tell us that the police records do not show them because of privacy laws?

So your claim is worthless.

Did you hope to get away with it?
 
And now you tell us that the police records do not show them because of privacy laws?

More misunderstanding of what was said.
men entering women’s toilets under false pretenses is rarely isolated in public reporting due to privacy laws.
The mata data would not be limited by privacy laws.

So your claim is worthless.
Worth more than your supposed evidence.
I'm still waiting.
 
What makes him assume that it was not a pervert using the toilet for nefarious reasons? Or that it was a transman wearing a dress? Do they do that?
I didn't.
I said it could have been a transman, Which means they would be perfectly entitled, even obliged, to use the female toilets.

Did you ignore that bit?
 
But you falsely implied that absence of records indicated absence of complaints.
You mean that complaints may have been made, but no record was produced?
That's highly unlikely.

You claimed you'd witnessed many occurrences of such events. Did you report such events?
 
Why would a transman be wearing a dress?
You've lost the plot.
No-one suggested a tansman would be wearing a dress.
So i think we can describe this one as yet another strawman argument.
They're coming thick and fast now. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top