More strawmen arguments. is that all you've got?
It's not an argument, it's a question.
More strawmen arguments. is that all you've got?
Strange that the police forces have no record of such instances,

It's a question based on an argument that you imagined.It's not an argument, it's a question.
Yes a bit off topic accept my deepest apologies
But you falsely implied that absence of records indicated absence of complaints.It's a question based on ana argument that you imagined.
No-one claimed to have interrogated the police records.
Exactly, hes delusional.What makes him assume that it was not a pervert using the toilet for nefarious reasons?

And now you tell us that the police records do not show them because of privacy laws?
The mata data would not be limited by privacy laws.men entering women’s toilets under false pretenses is rarely isolated in public reporting due to privacy laws.
Worth more than your supposed evidence.So your claim is worthless.

I didn't.What makes him assume that it was not a pervert using the toilet for nefarious reasons? Or that it was a transman wearing a dress? Do they do that?
I said it could have been a transman,

You mean that complaints may have been made, but no record was produced?But you falsely implied that absence of records indicated absence of complaints.

Another question based on a Strawman argument again.Why is the pro-Trans lobby obsessed with letting men into women's toilets?
Why is the pro-Trans lobby obsessed with letting men into women's toilets?

You've lost the plot.Why would a transman be wearing a dress?